Many animals are endangered. Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
-
May 6, 2022 at 2:05 pm
Many animals are endangered. Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that should people provide protection for all animals? while it is true that preserving all animals seems difficult, i do believe that there are more benefits to doing so.
On the one hand, compared to protecting all animals, there are many disadvantaged people and countries that need help, they may suffer from diseases or die from starvation or drop out of school owing to poverty. Giving assistance to them is more essential. Besides, government funds are limited, if this money goes to animal preservation, other fields like public healthcare and fundamental education will lack necessary financial support, which is disadvantageous to public interest. Lastly, some people believe that species which cannot survive means that they are not suitable for the earth’s present environment, it is nature’s selection, so just let them go.
On the other hand, i strongly argue that protection of all animals is necessary and important. it is beneficial to the sustainment of bio-diversity, some herbivore animals are food of other carnivores like tigers and lions, if we just give shield to some parts of animals, it will lead to the unbalance in food chain and damage to bio-diversity. in addition, protection of all animals can bring lots of benefits to humans. For example, some endangered animals like pandas, seem not “useful” to humans because we can not eat them for meat, but they contribute to local tax since people all over the world are likely to go to their preserve and pay for a visit. Last but not least, the reason why some animals are regarded as useless is that people have not yet found their unique functions. For instance, people invented some radar technologies after doing research about bats. so we should believe that people will learn more surprising knowledge from all animals instead of just presently useful ones.
In conclusion, while preserving all species seems to put a huge financial burden on people, i still hold the idea that its advantages outweigh disadvantages.
May 7, 2022 at 3:11 pm- Fix issues suggested in screenshot reviews;
- Restrict each paragraph to 90 words.
May 15, 2022 at 5:23 amIt is sometimes argued that should people provide protection for all animals. While it is true that preserving all animals seems difficult, I do believe that there are more benefits to doing so.
On the one hand, compared with protecting all animals, there are many disadvantaged people and countries that need help. They may suffer from diseases, die of starvation or drop out of school owing to poverty. Giving assistance to them is more important. Besides, government funds are limited. If this money goes to animal preservation, other fields like public healthcare and fundamental education will lack necessary financial support, which is not conducive to public interests. Lastly, some people believe that species cannot survive means that they are not suitable for the earth’s current environment, and it is nature’s selection, so just let them go.
On the other hand, I strongly argue that the protection of all animals is necessary and important. It is beneficial to the sustainment of bio-diversity. Some herbivore animals are the food of other carnivores like tigers and lions. If we just give shield to some parts of animals, it will lead to an imbalance in the food chain and damage to bio-diversity. In addition, protecting all animals can bring lots of benefits to humans. For example, some endangered animals like giant pandas, seem not “useful” to humans because we can not eat them for meat, but they contribute to local taxes as people all over the world are likely to go to their reserves and pay for a visit. Last but not least, the reason why some animals are regarded as useless is that people have not yet found their unique functions. For instance, people invented some radar related technologies after doing research about bats. So we should trust that people will learn more surprising knowledge from all animals than just currently useful ones.
In conclusion, while preserving all species seems to place a huge financial burden on people, I still hold the idea that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
May 15, 2022 at 3:39 pmIt is sometimes argued [ unnecessary passive ]that[ should people (provide protection for)[wordy ] all animals][ grammatical error ]. While it is true that preserving all animals seems difficult[conflicting statement: true-seems ], I do believe that there are more benefits to doing so[unclear sentence/summarise your points ].
On the one hand, (compared with) protecting all animals, there[dangling: compared-there ] are many disadvantaged people and countries that need help. They may suffer from diseases, die of starvation or drop out of school owing to poverty. Giving assistance to them is more important. Besides, government funds are limited. If this money goes to animal preservation, other fields like public healthcare and fundamental education will lack necessary financial support, which is not conducive to public interests. Lastly, some people believe that species cannot survive means that they are not suitable for the earth’s current environment, and it is nature’s selection, so just let them go.
On the other hand, I strongly argue that the protection of all animals is necessary and important. It is beneficial to the sustainment of bio-diversity. Some herbivore animals are the food of other carnivores like tigers and lions. If we just give shield to some parts of animals, it will lead to an imbalance in the food chain and damage to bio-diversity. In addition, protecting all animals can bring lots of benefits to humans. For example, some endangered animals like giant pandas, seem not “useful” to humans because we can not eat them for meat, but they contribute to local taxes as people all over the world are likely to go to their reserves and pay for a visit. Last but not least, the reason why some animals are regarded as useless is that people have not yet found their unique functions. For instance, people invented some radar related technologies after doing research about bats. So we should trust that people will learn more surprising knowledge from all animals than just currently useful ones.
In conclusion, while preserving all species seems to place a huge financial burden on people, I still hold the idea that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
May 15, 2022 at 3:44 pmPartial revision [improve the clarity of each sentence and then resubmit your revised essay. ]
