Reply To: Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Reply To: Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.

kkming
University: Tianjin University
Nationality: Chinese
November 22, 2020 at 10:17 am

When it comes to whether to provide more financial support to art than to athletics, there always are some people arguing that governments should offer more support to art, while others disapprove. From my perspective, I prefer that the former proposal is wrong. There need more sophisticated thought about this issue.

There is no such judgment that art is more important than athletics. Though art does inspire humans a lot in all fabrics of society. It could not come to conclusion that this field is more vital to humans than athletics. Sports games always pursue the positive goal that achieving higher, faster and stronger. It is well known that humans indeed benefit from this goal. In some situations, athletics could offer more directly interests to the whole country and civilians. For example, In the Olympic Games held in Beijing in 2008, the most splendid and lavish game ever, athletics all over the world competed together to get higher grades in humans’ history. If someone got a gold medal, there is no doubt that he was honorable. Further, the country the winner represented would receive respects from other countries. The delight of winning would pull economic flourish, through such wins, all countries could benefit from it.  In this term, how could people endorse that governments should offer more aids to art?

If the governments support more on art than athletics, it means that country has not paid enough attention to athletics. Well, countries couldn’t get any visible gains.Thus, the governments should focus more on practical fields such as economic, sports games, standard of living, and so on.  Nowadays, the mainstream value deems that a country isn’t considered a powerful country without enough gold medals . In other words, a nation could improve its international status by supporting more on athletics.

So, the points I just described express which opinion I lean. Though art seems to be more vital to humans, it is more practical to think from the country’s angle. For more benefit a country can get, we should aid more on athletics.