Reply To: Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. › TOEFL Writing › Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. › Reply To: Governments should not spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
University: University of Wisconsin
Some people argue governments should offer more financial support to art, while others want to fund athletics instead. From my perspective, I prefer to support
more on athletics more because it will bring more money and glory to the country than art. I am going to elaborate this point in following paragraphs.
Funding athletics brings considerable profits to the country. For example, the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the most splendid and lavish ever, put China on the map in the athletic world and showed the power of Chinese society. If someone won a gold medal, there is no doubt that he is honorable. Further, the country that wins will be respected by other countries,
. T thus, more businesses will invest in the country investments can focus on this country. The winning country then enhances would end up with enhancing economic development. So, in the terms of profits, funding more on increasing funding for athletics is wiser.
Moreover, increasing the financial support towards the
supporting more on arts is of no use to a country’s progress advance. If the government s support more on art more than athletics, it means the government s has not paid enough attention to athletics. Art does not increase the national profile of a country With the fact that countries don’t get any visible gain, their national power improves slowly. Thus, the governments should focus more on practical fields such as economics, sports games, and standard of living , and so on. Nowadays, a country needs to perform well in the Olympics to maintain its national profile the mainstream value deems that a country isn’t considered a powerful country without enough gold medals. In other words, a nation can improve its international status by funding supporting more on athletics.
More aid Spending more on athletics also in leads people to put more emphasis stress on exercise. Nowadays, people lead busy lives, and are taking a busy life. there is less time for them to balance the work and life, not to mention their health. So more funds on athletics shows the decision of government s is appealing to appeal people to take their health seriously. Thus, there can’t be so many deaths called by less exercise.
So, the points I just described express which opinion I prefer. In conclusion, financially supporting more on athletics more will not only make considerable profit s for governments but also lead people to attach importance to health. In short, funding more on athletics is better.