Reply To: Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Reply To: Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

April 23, 2021 at 1:02 am

Financial support from the government is important for all studies, [ developments in ]arts, sciences, sports[ ., etc. ] and so on. However, some people think the support in[wrong preposition  ] the arts should be more than in sports[unclear  ]. From where I stand, I disagree with the[ this ] opinion.

First of all, sports are necessary[word choice issue  ] in our daily life. Doing sports is one of the best ways to have a healthy body. From this aspect, supporting our Olympic teams can promote different kinds of sports and make people have more interest[ed  ] in doing sports. For example, table tennis is popular in China. Almost everyone has watched [Many Chinese watch  ]matches of table tennis and played[ play ] it once. Although the sport itself has some [ Despite the innate ]attractions [ of this sport ], the good results made by our [ the Chinese ]national team in international competitions are another important reason for this phenomenon[also facilitate this sport in China  ]. In some way, the financial support of[for  ] some Olympic teams can inspire people’s enthusiasm in doing sports. However, the investment of[wrong preposition  ] the[article error  ] arts does not have such a great effect because for most people, the[ article error ] arts are not necessary in[ wrong preposition ] their daily life and it is difficult for them to get access to the arts.

Secondly, although the arts need a large amount of investigation[wrong word  ], (it is hard to)[ avoid using IT IS ADJECTIVE ] demonstrate that the investment is worthy. Most investments in the arts do not[avoid using NOT  ] have as much reward as expected. For example, the prince of a country have[ grammatical error ] once bought a masterpiece of[wrong preposition  ] DaVinci at a high price [grammatical error  ](which was then[ /subsequently ] identified to be painted by one of DaVinci’s students)[ misplaced ]. This investment is, of course, in vain.( So the money spent on the arts sometimes is meaningless and )[ repetition ]the government could not always( identify the rignt support)[unclear  ]. On the contrary, the support of [wrong preposition  ]sports can always make sense[  zero-conditional]. The training is more effective[unclear  ] with [ unclear preposition ]advanced facilities and better coaches.

In conclusion, the support of [wrong preposition  ]the arts should not be higher than the support of athletics.