A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
-
July 2, 2022 at 2:48 pm
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education equality become dramatically important nowadays, aiming at eliminating the gaps among students from families with different classes. Therefore, there is a voice that all the students should take the same national curriculum until they enter college. In this way, they hope, to diminish the differences caused by diverse education.
Admittedly, this action will definitely, to some extent, decrease the variance among students, and equality of education is also critical. It means that even students from the poorest region would have the same courses as students from wealthy families, which indicates fewer class gaps.
However, its advantages are limited. Wealthy families are able to improve their children by paying for after-class activities. Also, teachers in big cities seem more experienced and skillful in teaching methods, which will exacerbate the gaps between the rich and the poor. What’s more, the same curriculum would also eliminate the diversity of students’ talents. For instance, a student, skilled at math but not good with music, will be more engaged and have more advances in math if music classes are removed from his individual timetable. The time saved by abandoning music class will enable him to pursue more advances in math.
In conclusion, although education equality is important, the approach that studying the same curriculum is not suitable, which may smother the diversity potentials of different students, and even backfire.
July 3, 2022 at 1:45 amFix issues suggested in the screenshot reviews.
July 5, 2022 at 1:20 amFixed version:
Education equality becomes dramatically important nowadays, aiming at diminishing the gaps among students from families with different classes. Therefore, there is a voice that all students should take the same national curriculum until they enter college. In this way, they hope, to diminish the differences caused by diverse education.
Admittedly, this action will, to some extent, decrease the variance among students, and equality of education is also critical. It means that even students from the poorest region would have the same courses as students from wealthy families, which indicates fewer class gaps.
However, its advantages are limited. Wealthy families can improve their children by paying for after-class activities. Also, teachers in big cities seem more experienced and skilful in teaching methods, which will exacerbate the gaps between the rich and the poor. Besides, the same curriculum would also eliminate the diversity of students’ talents. For instance, students, skilled at math but not good with musical instruments, will be more engaged and have more advances in math if music classes are removed from his class schedule. The time saved by abandoning music class will enable him to pursue more advances in math.
In conclusion, although education equality is critical, the approach that studys the same curriculum is not suitable, which may smother the diverse potentials of different students, and even backfire.
July 5, 2022 at 2:35 pmEducation equality becomes dramatically important nowadays, aiming at diminishing the gaps among students from families with different classes. Therefore, there is a voice that all students should take the same national curriculum until they enter college. In this way, they hope, to diminish the differences caused by diverse education.
Admittedly, this action will, to some extent, decrease the variance among students, and equality of education is also critical. It means that even students from the poorest region would have the same courses as students from wealthy families, which indicates fewer class gaps.
However, its advantages are limited. Wealthy families can improve their children by paying for after-class activities. Also, teachers in big cities seem more experienced and skilful in teaching methods, which will exacerbate the gaps between the rich and the poor. Besides, the same curriculum would also eliminate the diversity of students’ talents. For instance, students, skilled at math but not good with musical instruments, will be more engaged and have more advances in math if music classes are removed from his class schedule. The time saved by abandoning music class will enable him to pursue more advances in math.
In conclusion, although education equality is critical, the approach that studys the same curriculum is not suitable, which may smother the diverse potentials of different students, and even backfire.
July 12, 2022 at 3:27 pmEducation equality becomes [ /has become ] dramatically important
nowadays, aiming at diminishing[since it could diminish ] the gaps among students from [ varying family backgrounds ]families with different classes. Therefore, there is a voice that all students should take the same national curriculum until they enter college[, which… ] . In this way, they[unclear pronoun ] hope, to diminish[ repetition ] the differences caused by (diverse education)[ unclear ] .Admittedly, this action[ unclear /adopting a uniform curriculum] will, to some extent, decrease (the variance among students)[unclear, which facilitates educational equality. ]
, and equality of education is also critical.It[ Unclear ]means that[By this measure, ] even students fromthepoorest region[ s ] would have[ vague/matriculate in ] the same courses as students from wealthy families[ /areas ] , (which indicates fewer class gaps)[unclear ] .However, its[ unclear pronoun ] advantages are limited. Wealthy families can[still ] improve[/cultivate ] their children by paying for after-class activities. Also, teachers in big cities seem[ /are generally ] more experienced and skilful in teaching methods, which
will[ further exacerbates ]exacerbatethe gaps between the rich and the poor. Besides, [implementing ] the same curriculum would also eliminate the diversity of students’ talents[ word form error ] . For instance, students, skilled at math but not good with musical instruments, will be[ /become ] more engaged and have more advances in math [ learning ] if music classes are removed from his [their ] class schedule.[grammatical error/ If ..did…would) ] [ As a result, the saved time from ]The time saved byabandoning music class will enable him to (pursue more advances)[ repetition ] in math.In conclusion, although education equality is critical[ repetition ] , the approach that studys[ word form error ] the same curriculum is not suitable, which may smother the diverse potentials of different students, and even backfire.
July 12, 2022 at 3:44 pmFinal revision
