All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

  • Timmothy Ling
    University: Soochow University
    Nationality: China
    May 23, 2020 at 12:37 pm

    All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

    Taking history courses helps students have a better grasp of the previous incidents, and makes them clear about how the world developed. However, it makes no sense that all university students are supposed to be required to take the history courses whatever their field is. So, i am totally against the statement.

    Admittedly, it can not be denied that taking history courses is advantageous to the comprehensive development of a student. It deserves to be mentioned that history can broaden our visions, which means that we will grasp a great deal of knowledge about it. Thus, when talking to others, it seems that we are full of knowledge and topics, we talk about what happened before, the heroes recorded in the long history river,the sensational wars happening previously and so on.

    However, when it comes to all unviersity students, making the history courses a required class is not that rational. Because, not everyone has the passion and interest in the history. There is an old saying goes: Interest is the best teacher in the world. Without interest, requirements become the burden of students. They wlii not be motivated to study the history, not to say enjoy learning it.

    Moreover, students majored in a number of specific subjects have tons of school works to finish, such as mathmaticas, computer science, and physics. These students are in lack of time for additional learning , the most majority of them are not even able to understand the required courses well.For examples, in fact, history is a required class in our school, but there is a common phenomenon that a prodigious number of students majored in sciences write their homework in the history class ,paying little attention to what the professors talk abotut.

    In conclusion, learing history benefits students,which can help us grasp more knowledge. But when it comes to all students required to take it, it does not make sense. Because firstly,chances are that students void interests in history, secondly, it is possible that a number of students are in deficient of time.

    May 24, 2020 at 3:37 pm

    Score: ungraded

    Issues:

    1. About 45% of the sentences exceed 20 words. Shorten/split them.
    2. About 30% of the sentences are passive. Convert some of them into their active counterparts.

    I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.

    Timmothy Ling
    University: Soochow University
    Nationality: China
    May 26, 2020 at 11:28 am

    Taking history courses can do a benefit to students, like having a better grasp of the previous incidents, making them clear about how the world developed. However, it makes no sense that all university students have to be required to take the history courses whatever their field is. So, I am totally against the statement.

    Admittedly,we can not deny that taking history courses is beneficial to students. It can really assist students with their comprehensive development. History can broaden our visions, which means that we will grasp a great deal of knowledge about it. Thus, we will have numerous topics to talk with others, such as heroes recorded in the long history river, sensational wars, the development of America.

    However, when it comes to all university students, making the history courses a required one is not that rational. Because not everyone has the passion and interest in history. There is an old saying that interest is the best teacher in the world. Without passion, requirements become the burden of students. They wlii not be motivated to study history, not to say enjoy learning it.

    Moreover, students majoring in a number of specific subjects, such as mathematics, computer science and physics, have tons of school work to finish. The most majority of them are not even able to understand the professional courses well. These students are in lack of energy for additional learning. Actually, history is a required class in our school. There is a common phenomenon that a prodigious number of students majoring in sciences write their homework when taking history courses, paying little attention to what the professors talk about.

    In conclusion, learning history benefits students, which can help us grasp more knowledge. But when it comes to all students required to take it, it does not make sense. why? First, as chances are that students void interests in history. Second, it is possible that a giagantic number of students are in deficient of energy.

    May 29, 2020 at 3:09 am

    Score: ungraded

    Taking history courses can do a benefit to help students, like having to obtain a better grasp of the previous incidents, making them clear about/making them cognizant of how the world has developed. However, it makes no sense that I am of the opinion that requiring all university students have to be required to take the matriculate in history courses/coursework whatever regardless of their field is unwise/imprudent. So, I am totally against the statement.

    Admittedly, we can not deny that taking completing history courses is beneficial to students. It can really assist facilitate students with their comprehensive overall development. History can broaden our visions, which means that we will grasp a great deal and enrich the scope of our knowledge about it. Thus, Having gained broad history knowledge, we will could converse with others have by drawing on numerous topics to talk with others, such as heroic figures heroes recorded in the long history river, sensational brutal wars, even (the development of America)[  unclear ].

    However, when it comes to all university students, Even so, I believe that making the history courses a required one compulsory is not that rational won’t meet all students’ intellectual needs. Because not everyone has the a passion and interest in for history, . There is an old saying that interest is the best teacher in the world. Without passion, requirements this academic requirement can become the an unnecessary burden of for some students. They wlii not be motivated to study history, not to say enjoy learning it.

    (Moreover, students majoring in a number of specific subjects, such as mathematics, computer science and physics, have tons of school work to finish.)[irrelevant/   ] (The most majority of them are not even able to understand the professional courses well. These students are in lack of energy for additional learning. )[  repetition with prior content ]Actually, history is a required class in our school. There is a common phenomenon that a prodigious number of students majoring in sciences write their homework when taking history courses, paying little attention to what the professors talk about.[This paragraph is off the topic.    ]

    In conclusion, learning history benefits students, which can help us grasp more knowledge. But when it comes to all students required to take it, it does not make sense.[repetition   ] why? (First, as chances are that students void interests in history. Second, it is possible that a giagantic number of students are in deficient of energy.)[lots of grammatical errors   ]

    May 29, 2020 at 3:38 am

    Final Revision