Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is the greatest heavy traffic.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is the greatest heavy traffic.

  • 13507712208
    University: Pekin University
    Nationality: China
    December 8, 2021 at 5:32 am

    Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is the greatest heavy traffic.

    When browsing information through the media, we may realize that traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic jam problem, some people propose that it’s helpful to publish a regulation to charge the drivers who drive in the main city streets during the busiest time. However, I oppose this solution for the following reasons.

    First of all, it’s an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, normally the biggest problem arises at 7-9 am and 6-8 pm from Monday to Friday which is the exact time for labor to go to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees, they still need to go out to work. Therefore, this proposal is incapable of reducing the number of cars.

    Additionally, it’s unequal for employees who can decide neither the time nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. When I was intern of a company, I drove through the whole Beijing city on the main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, the governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehecles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it’s possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It’s more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 8, 2021 at 1:32 pm

    <span lang=”EN-US”> (remove this formatting)When browsing information through the media (simplify), we may realize (word choice) that traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic jam (delete) problem, some people propose that it’s (do not use contractions) helpful to publish a regulation to charge the drivers who drive in the main city streets during the busiest time (also known as congestion pricing). However, I oppose this solution for the following reasons (shortly include some reasons here).</span>

    <span lang=”EN-US”>First of all, it’s an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, normally the biggest problem arises at 7-9 am and 6-8 pm from Monday to Friday which is the exact time for labor to go to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees, they still need to go out to work. Therefore, this proposal is incapable of reducing the number of cars.</span>

    <span lang=”EN-US”>Additionally, it’s unequal for employees who can decide neither the time nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. When I was intern of a company, I drove through the whole Beijing city on the main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced. </span>

    <span lang=”EN-US”>Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, the governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehecles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it’s possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.</span>

    <span lang=”EN-US”>In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It’s more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.</span>

    December 8, 2021 at 1:32 pm

    Partial Revision (please fix similar errors, revise whole essay, and resubmit)

    13507712208
    University: Pekin University
    Nationality: China
    December 9, 2021 at 2:09 am

    When browsing newspapers and Internet, we may notice that traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic problem, some people propose that it is helpful to publish a regulation to charge congestion pricing. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that it is useless and even harmful..

    First of all, it is an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, normally the biggest problem arises at 7-9 am and 6-8 pm from Monday to Friday which is the exact time for labor to go to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees, they still need to go out to work. Therefore, this proposal is incapable of reducing the number of cars.

    Additionally, it is unequal for employees who can decide neither the time nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. When I was intern of a company, I drove through the whole Beijing city on the main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, the governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 10, 2021 at 10:57 am

    When browsing newspapers and Internet, we may notice that (is this necessary?) traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic problem, some people propose that it is helpful to publish a regulation to charge (delete) congestion pricing. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that it is useless and even harmful (why? short explanation in intro).

    First of all, it is an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, normally (delete) the biggest problem arises at 7-9 am and 6-8 pm (rush hour) from Monday to Friday which is the exact time for labor (commuters) to go  (improve word choice) to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees, they still need to go out (delete) to work. Therefore, this proposal is incapable of (simplify) reducing the number of cars.

    Additionally, it is unequal for employees who can decide neither the time nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. When I was (missing article) intern of a company (what company?), I drove through the whole Beijing (delete) city on the (delete) main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, the governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 10, 2021 at 10:57 am

    Partial Revision (please fix similar errors, revise whole essay, and resubmit)

    13507712208
    University: Pekin University
    Nationality: China
    December 12, 2021 at 11:46 am

    Traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic jam problem in busy streets, some people propose congestion fee. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that it is useless for the traffic jam and will add an unnecessary burden to normal workers.

    First of all, it’s an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, the biggest problem arises at rush hour which is the exact time for commuters to travel to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees during these hours, they still need to go to work. Therefore, this proposal  will not decrease the number of cars on the main streets during the busiest time.

    Additionally, it’s unequal for employees who can decide neither the time of working nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. I was an intern of a famous technology  company, I drove through the whole city on main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

     

    December 13, 2021 at 7:23 pm

    Traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. In order to address the traffic jam problem in busy streets, some people propose congestion fee. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that it is useless for the traffic jam and will add an unnecessary burden to normal workers.

    First of all, it’s an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, the biggest problem arises at rush hour which is the exact time for commuters to travel to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees during these hours, they still need to go to work. Therefore, this proposal  will not decrease the number of cars on the main streets during the busiest time.

    Additionally, it’s unequal for employees who can decide neither the time of working nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. I was an intern of a famous technology  company, I drove through the whole city on main streets during the most crowded time just because there is no suitable public transportation and I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus and he can choose freely both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so huge and dangerous that significantly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 13, 2021 at 7:26 pm

    Fix issues indicated on screenshot reviews and then resubmit.

    13507712208
    University: Pekin University
    Nationality: China
    December 14, 2021 at 3:31 am

    Traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. To address the traffic jam problem in busy streets, some people propose congestion pricing. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that it is useless for the traffic jam and will add an unnecessary burden to normal workers.

    First of all, it’s an inefficient way to control the city traffic. As we all know, the biggest problem arises at rush hour when is the exact time for commuters to travel to their workplace. Even though they are required to pay fees during these hours, they still need to commute. Therefore, this proposal will not decrease the number of cars on the main streets during the busiest time.

    Additionally, it’s unequal for employees who can decide neither the time of working nor the place of working. Take my experience as an example. I was an intern at a famous technology company, I drove through the whole city on the main streets during the most crowded time just because there was no suitable public transportation but I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus but he can  decide by himself both his working time and place. If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class like my boss is seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees. However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the citizens. For example, governments can ban trucks taking up the space of main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so large and dangerous that they greatly slow down the speed of the traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the traffic pressure after limiting their appearance.

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 14, 2021 at 11:16 am

    Traffic problems have risen rapidly with the process of urbanization. To address the traffic jam problem in busy streets, some people propose congestion pricing. However, I reject this notion and instead believe that (delete) it is useless for the (does not solve) traffic jams and will (delete) adds an unnecessary burden to normal workers.

    First of all (delete), it’s (it is) an inefficient way to control the (delete) city traffic. As we all know, (delete) the biggest problem arises (most traffic jams occur) at rush hour when is the exact time for (delete) commuters to travel to their workplace. Even though they are (would be) required to pay fees during these hours, they still need to commute. Therefore, this proposal will not decrease the number of cars on the main streets (delete) during the busiest time.

    Additionally, it’s (it is) unequal for (an unfair burden on) employees who can decide neither the time of working nor the place of working (do not decide their hours or place of work). Take my experience as an example. (For example,) I was an intern at a famous technology company, and I drove through the whole city on the main streets during the most crowded time just (delete) because there was no suitable public transportation(add comma) but I had a fixed office time. On the other hand, my boss lives in the same district of my campus (area as our office) but he can decide by himself both (delete) his working time and place (hours). If this fee regulation was approved, regular workers like me with low salaries and unadjustable routines are punished while wealthy upper-class managers like my boss is  (are) seldom influenced.

    Admittedly, some people may reconsider their transportation choice after charging fees (paying congestion pricing). However, there are more suitable ways to achieve the same goal with a minor impact on the (delete) citizens. For example, governments can ban trucks taking up the space of (on) main streets during the busiest hours. These vehicles are so large and dangerous that they greatly slow down the speed of the (delete) traffic flow, so it is possible to relieve the (delete) traffic pressure after limiting their appearance (mobility).

    In conclusion, this solution of charging fees (congestion pricing) is useless and unequal. It is more reasonable to adopt other measures to reduce the traffic jams on the main city roads.

    December 21, 2021 at 2:22 pm

    Final Revision