Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Partial revision [ fix all article errors in your essay.]

In most countries, governments usually spend more money in support of [ supporting  ]athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams than in support of arts. Nowadays, more voices appear to change (this kind of situation)[ unclear  ]. I consider myself one of those voices, as I agree that governments should spend more money on the arts.

To begin with, supporting arts can (produce some long-term benefits for the culture of this country)[ wordy/promote cultural prosperity  ]; meanwhile [punctuation error   ]supporting athletics [ ,however,  ]can barely leave[  /lead to/result in ] some long-term outcomes. For example, those beautiful drawings and sculptures in the Nation Museum of China have been symbols of China the country.[ unclear  ] Those legacies have been made[unnecessary passive   ] for more than hundreds of years but are still alive as a[article error   ] part of China’s history and culture. Some medals in Olympics can never replace the value[word form error   ] brought by (those artworks)[word form error   ]. Those (achievements of arts)[wordy, unclear   ] may benefit the country for more than hundreds of years[ unclear  ].

Also, it should be noticed that the athletics[ word form error  ] of a country are not as influential as they used to be. Maybe 100 or 200 years ago, the grades of the athletics of a country can stand for the force and the influence of this country, but for this age we are currently living in, things have changed[ wordy, unclear sentence full of useless words “the, the, and, for…”  ]. There are much more [More   ]factors that can illustrate the situation and the force of a country, for instance, the number of people using smartphones may be a better statistic data than this country’s number of medals in the Olympics.[ lengthy, unclear sentence  ] Governments[ sweeping statement  ] used to spend so much money to support[ grammatical error  ] those Olympics teams because they try[grammatical error   ] to show their power to other countries. Since the[ article error  ] athletics of a country now can only stand for a little aspect of the power of this country, they should not continue to cost so much money and resources anymore.

Time has changed, [ punctuation error  ]athletics’ value is now less than arts’, and governments must commit[wrong word   ] some actions to be adapted[ unnecessary passive  ] to this new situation.