It is a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

With the remarkable development of technology, the enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe are increasing in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could have been used to make a tangible contribution to society. Provided that the government invest more on infrastructures that are conducive to the growth of economy, more dwellers can benefit from the infrastructures that can generate considerable employment. In that case, people’s living standards get improved and criminal rate declines, which ensure the stability of a nation. Hence, cutting down expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

What is more, there are still thorny and costly problems that remain to be solved in this world. Those issues should be the first priority for government worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as melting of icebergs and increase of sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies can not effectively tackle that problem. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, the environment will keep deteriorating. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce the cost for space exploration, create further social welfare and focus on existing problems.

With the remarkable development of technology, people’s enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe are rising in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could be used to make a tangible contribution to society. If the government invests more in infrastructures conducive to the growth of the economy, more dwellers can benefit from the infrastructures that can generate considerable employment. In that case, people’s living standards get improved and crime rate declines, which ensures nation’s stability. Hence, cutting down the expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

What is more, there are still thorny and costly problems that remain to be solved in this world. Those issues should be the priority for governments worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as the melting of icebergs and the increase in sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies fail to effectively tackle that problem. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, bad effects will exacerbate the global problem. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce space exploration costs, create further social welfare, and focus on existing problems.

With the remarkable development of technology, people’s enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe show an upward trend in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could make a tangible contribution to society. For example, if the government invests more in infrastructures conducive to social welfare, such as sanctuary and free educational institution, more citizens can benefit from it. Homeless people can find a place to keep warm and spare themselves from starvation. Poor students can afford education without debts’ pressure. In that case, people’s living standards get improved, and the crime rate drops, which ensures social stability and prosperity. Hence, cutting down the expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

What is more, many thorny problems remain to be solved in this world. Those issues are priorities for governments worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as the melting of icebergs and the increase in sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies fail to tackle that problem effectively. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, bad effects will exacerbate the global problem. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce space exploration costs, create further social welfare, and focus on existing problems.