It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

  • blackberry
    University: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    Nationality: China Mainland
    December 13, 2021 at 8:29 am

    It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

    When it comes to working scheduling, some people insist that having a job with less working days and long working hours is more attractive, because it seems to provide them with long and integral day off. However, I argue that these jobs are less enjoyable and alluring, since people have to undertake high pressure and endure reduction of efficiency and effectiveness, which leads to lower levels of happiness.

    To commence with, one tends to be stressed out with these jobs. Mentally, people concentrate on tasks for a long period, especially for those who are involved in brainwork, such as calculating, coding or designing. Even worse, mental labors may sometimes cannot figure out a solution or run out of inspiration. When these happen, they had better have a good rest instead of persevere at work. However, due to job requirements, they have to expose to mental tasks without further achievements, causing rather high pressure for them.

    Physically, staring at screens, upholding bricks or standing in the streets are energy-consuming. These activities consume people’s stamina and make people completely exhausted. After work, people have to spend much more time recovering. Thus, though these jobs seem to provide more leisure time, people in effect cannot enjoy the extra periods. Worse still, these jobs are more detrimental to health than jobs with less working hours in this sense. In the long run, people may spend more money on medication, and have to bear aches or vision diminutions.

    Equally important, long-hour working leads to the reduction of efficiency and effectiveness. One may not be able to finish assigned work in a limited time, or, cannot accomplish work with satisfactory quality. This undoubtedly leads to a lower satisfaction level of leaders, harms the relationships with managers and decreases KPIs. In the long term, this affects one’s promotions and wage hikes adversely, and chances are that people may confront dismissal.

    In conclusion, I personally believe that jobs with less working days and long working hours are less attractive and less pleasant.

    December 14, 2021 at 11:04 am

    When it comes to working (delete) scheduling, some people insist that having a job with less (quantifier error) working days and long working hours is more attractive, (delete) because it seems to provide them with long and integral day off (simplify). However, I argue that these jobs are less enjoyable and alluring, (word choice error and delete comma) since people have to undertake high pressure (simplify) and endure reduction of efficiency and effectiveness (simplify), which leads to lower levels of happiness.

     

    To commence with (Firstly), one tends to be stressed out with these jobs. Mentally, people concentrate on tasks for a long period, especially for those who are involved in brainwork, such as calculating, coding or designing. Even worse, mental labors may sometimes cannot figure out a solution or run out of inspiration. When these happen, they had better have a good rest instead of persevere at work. However, due to job requirements, they have to expose to mental tasks without further achievements, causing rather high pressure for them.

     

    Physically, staring at screens, upholding bricks or standing in the streets are energy-consuming. These activities consume people’s stamina and make people completely exhausted. After work, people have to spend much more time recovering. Thus, though these jobs seem to provide more leisure time, people in effect cannot enjoy the extra periods. Worse still, these jobs are more detrimental to health than jobs with less working hours in this sense. In the long run, people may spend more money on medication, and have to bear aches or vision diminutions.

     

    Equally important, long-hour working leads to the reduction of efficiency and effectiveness. One may not be able to finish assigned work in a limited time, or, cannot accomplish work with satisfactory quality. This undoubtedly leads to a lower satisfaction level of leaders, harms the relationships with managers and decreases KPIs. In the long term, this affects one’s promotions and wage hikes adversely, and chances are that people may confront dismissal.

     

    In conclusion, I personally believe that jobs with less working days and long working hours are less attractive and less pleasant.

    December 14, 2021 at 11:04 am

    Partial Revision (please fix similar errors, revise whole essay, and resubmit)

    blackberry
    University: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    Nationality: China Mainland
    December 14, 2021 at 1:00 pm

    When it comes to scheduling, some people insist that having a job with fewer working days and long working hours is more attractive because they seem to enjoy long and integral days off. However, I argue that these jobs are less enjoyable and intriguing since people have to undertake high pressure and suffer reduced efficiency and effectiveness, which leads to lower levels of happiness.

    Firstly, one tends to be stressed out with these jobs. Mentally, people concentrate on tasks for a long period, especially when they are involved in heavy brainwork, such as calculating, coding or designing. Even worse, mental labors may sometimes be unable to come up with a solution or run out of inspiration. When these events occur, instead of persevering at work, they should take a rest. However, job requirements compel them to stay on the job while achieving nothing, causing great pressure and wasting time.

    Physically, standing in the street, holding bricks or staring at screens consumes much energy. These activities drain people’s stamina and exhaust them. After work, people must spend more time recuperating. So even though these jobs seem to offer more leisure time, people cannot really benefit from them. Furthermore, these jobs are worse for your health than jobs with fewer working hours. Long-term, people may spend more money on medication, and may experience aches or reduced vision due to continuous work.

    Second, working long hours reduces efficiency and effectiveness. With long working hours, one could not be able to finish assigned work on time or accomplish tasks competently. Ultimately, delayed or poor-quality work results in leaders’ low satisfaction, worsened worker-manager relationships and decreased KPIs. In the long run, employees could suffer demotions, wage deductions or dismissal.

    In conclusion, I personally believe that jobs with less working days and long working hours are less pleasant.

    December 14, 2021 at 2:41 pm

    When it comes to scheduling[word choice error   ], some people insist that having a job with fewer working days and[ but  ] long working hours is[grammatical error   ] more attractive[logical confusion…having…should   ] because they[ unclear pronoun  ] seem to enjoy long and integral days off. However, I argue that these jobs are less enjoyable and intriguing[wrong word   ] since people[ unclear  ] have to undertake[ wrong word  ] high pressure and suffer[ preposition error  ] reduced efficiency and effectiveness, which leads[absolute statement   ] to lower levels of happiness.

    Firstly, one tends to be stressed out with these jobs. Mentally, people concentrate on tasks for a long period, especially when they are involved in heavy brainwork, such as calculating, coding or designing. Even worse, mental labors may sometimes be unable to come up with a solution or run out of inspiration. When these events occur, instead of persevering at work, they should take a rest. However, job requirements compel them to stay on the job while achieving nothing, causing great pressure and wasting time.

    Physically, standing in the street, holding bricks or staring at screens consumes much energy. These activities drain people’s stamina and exhaust them. After work, people must spend more time recuperating. So even though these jobs seem to offer more leisure time, people cannot really benefit from them. Furthermore, these jobs are worse for your health than jobs with fewer working hours. Long-term, people may spend more money on medication, and may experience aches or reduced vision due to continuous work.

    Second, working long hours reduces efficiency and effectiveness. With long working hours, one could not be able to finish assigned work on time or accomplish tasks competently. Ultimately, delayed or poor-quality work results in leaders’ low satisfaction, worsened worker-manager relationships and decreased KPIs. In the long run, employees could suffer demotions, wage deductions or dismissal.

    In conclusion, I personally believe that jobs with less working days and long working hours are less pleasant.

    December 17, 2021 at 3:54 pm

    Partial revision