It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

  • shu yiyi
    University: HUNAN university
    Nationality: china
    January 4, 2022 at 3:28 am

    It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

    With the development of society, people may look forward to better public transportation and faster internet condition. At the same, the increasing of government revenue is limited, it is so hard to keep a balance of transportation and internet condition. It is hard to deny that better public may accelerate the speed of economic development, in the past. It misleads some people believe that we should spend more money on building new public transportation. However this statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. As far as effectiveness, economic impact, and social stability are concerned, I strongly hold the opinion that we should spend more time on internet access.

    To begin with, spending more money on the internet access is more effective than improving public transportation, as building the new road and subway may spend more time and money. The government should employ thousands of engineers and worker to build the road across the mountain and dig the tunnel under the land. Meanwhile people may not use these public transportation at first,the government should spend more time to cover their costs.  On the other hand, the government just need to buy some communication devices   or build some signal tower to improving the internet access, a number of people are benefited.

    Secondly, The fact that improving internet access is benefit to developing the economic, indicates that it should be spent more money. The third revolution in science and technology is a digital revolution,if we can grasp the chance of  internet revolution,we may get great development.Take case of china which devoted lots of money to 5G technology and took internet access into countryside in past 10 years .As a result,Numbers of successful IT company were established,and earned much profit,like HUAWEI and TECENT.Had it not been for spending money on internet access ,China would never become the world’s  second largest economy.

    In conclusion,since improving internet access is more effective ,and it may benefit to economic development,the government should spend more money on internet.

     

    January 7, 2022 at 2:48 pm

    Please fix all errors suggested on screenshot reviews and then resubmit.

    shu yiyi
    University: HUNAN university
    Nationality: china
    January 7, 2022 at 3:50 pm

    With the development of society, people may look forward to better public transportation and faster internet condition. Meanwhile, the growth of government revenue is limited。 It is so difficult to keep a balance of transportation building and internet condition. It is hard to deny that better public may accelerate the economic development, in the past, and such a fact leads some people to generate the opinion that we should spend more money on building new public transportation. Such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, as far as effectiveness, economic impact, and social stability are concerned, I strongly hold that we should spend more money on internet access.

    To begin with, spending more money on internet access is more effective than improving public transportation, as building the new road and subway may cost more time and money. Government should employ thousands of engineers and workers to build the road across the mountain and dig the tunnel under the land. But people may not use these public transport facilities at once, government should spend more time to recover their costs. On the other hand, the government needs to buy little communication devices and builds signal towers to improve the internet access, many people will benefit from it.

    Secondly, the fact that better internet access is beneficial to economic development indicates that government should invest more in it. Third revolution in science and technology is a digital revolution。If we can grasp the chance of internet, we may get great success. Take the case of China which devoted lots of money to 5G technology and took internet access into villages in the past 10 years. As a result, numerous successful IT company were established, and earned much profit, for example, HUAWEI and TECENT. Had it not been for Chinese heavy emphasis on IT, China would never become the world’s second-largest economy.

    In conclusion, since internet access ensure both better effectiveness and economy, government should invest more money on internet.

     

    January 8, 2022 at 9:44 pm

    With the development of society, people may look forward to better public transportation and faster internet condition. Meanwhile, the growth of government revenue is limited。 It is so difficult to keep a balance of transportation building and internet condition. It is hard to deny that better public may accelerate the economic development, in the past, and such a fact leads some people to generate the opinion that we should spend more money on building new public transportation. Such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, as far as effectiveness, economic impact, and social stability are concerned, I strongly hold that we should spend more money on internet access.

    To begin with, spending more money on internet access is more effective than improving public transportation, as building the new road and subway may cost more time and money. Government should employ thousands of engineers and workers to build the road across the mountain and dig the tunnel under the land. But people may not use these public transport facilities at once, government should spend more time to recover their costs. On the other hand, the government needs to buy little communication devices and builds signal towers to improve the internet access, many people will benefit from it.

    Secondly, the fact that better internet access is beneficial to economic development indicates that government should invest more in it. Third revolution in science and technology is a digital revolution。If we can grasp the chance of internet, we may get great success. Take the case of China which devoted lots of money to 5G technology and took internet access into villages in the past 10 years. As a result, numerous successful IT company were established, and earned much profit, for example, HUAWEI and TECENT. Had it not been for Chinese heavy emphasis on IT, China would never become the world’s second-largest economy.

    In conclusion, since internet access ensure both better effectiveness and economy, government should invest more money on internet.

    January 8, 2022 at 9:47 pm

    Fix all errors suggested on screenshot reviews.

    Use your own words to write.

    shu yiyi
    University: HUNAN university
    Nationality: china
    January 12, 2022 at 5:06 pm

    With the development of society, people may look forward to better public transportation and faster internet condition. Meanwhile, the growth of government revenue is limited。 It is so difficult to keep a balance of transportation building and internet condition. It is hard to deny that better public may accelerate the economic development, in the past, and such a fact leads some people to generate the idea that we should spend more money on building new public transportation. Such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies。 As far as effectiveness, economic impact, and social stability are concerned, I think that we should spend more money on internet access.

    To begin with, spending more money on internet access is more effective than improving public transportation, as building the new road and subway may cost more time and money. Government should employ thousands of engineers and workers to build the road across the mountain and dig the tunnel under the land. But people may not use these public transport facilities at once, governments should spend more time to recover their costs. On the other hand, the government needs to buy a few communication devices and build signal towers to improve internet access. Many people will benefit from it.

    Secondly, the fact that better internet access is beneficial to economic development indicates that government should invest more in it. The third revolution in science and technology is an internet revolution. If we can seize the opportunity of internet, we may get great success. Take the case of China, which devoted lots of money to 5G technology and took internet access into villages in the past ten years. As a result, Chinese people established numerous successful IT companies, and earned much profit, like HUAWEI and Tencent. Had it not been for China’s heavy emphasis on IT, China would never become the world’s second-largest economy.

    On account of better effectiveness and economy, governments should invest more money on internet.

    January 18, 2022 at 3:28 am

    With the development of society[ As society develops  ], [many   ]people may look forward to better public transportation and faster internet condition. Meanwhile, the growth of government revenue is limited。[  punctuation error ] It[  unclear pronoun ] is so[ wrong word  ] difficult to keep a balance of[ balance  ] transportation building and internet condition. It[ unclear pronoun  ] is hard to deny that better public may accelerate the economic development, in the past, and such a fact leads some people to generate the idea that we should spend more money on building new public transportation. Such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies。 As far as effectiveness, economic impact, and social stability are concerned, I think that we should spend more money on internet access.

    To begin with, spending more money on internet access is more effective than improving public transportation, as building the new road and subway may cost more time and money. Government should employ thousands of engineers and workers to build the road across the mountain and dig the tunnel under the land. But people may not use these public transport facilities at once, governments should spend more time to recover their costs. On the other hand, the government needs to buy a few communication devices and build signal towers to improve internet access. Many people will benefit from it.

    Secondly, the fact that better internet access is beneficial to economic development indicates that government should invest more in it. The third revolution in science and technology is an internet revolution. If we can seize the opportunity of internet, we may get great success. Take the case of China, which devoted lots of money to 5G technology and took internet access into villages in the past ten years. As a result, Chinese people established numerous successful IT companies, and earned much profit, like HUAWEI and Tencent. Had it not been for China’s heavy emphasis on IT, China would never become the world’s second-largest economy.

    On account of better effectiveness and economy, governments should invest more money on internet.

    January 18, 2022 at 3:33 am

    Partial revision [Essay contains a substantive number of problems.]