Many people use distance-learning programs(study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
-
July 6, 2020 at 1:08 pm
Many people use distance-learning programs(study material post, TV, Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, with the development of hi-tech, distance-learning has become possible gradually. However, between distance-learning and face-to-face learning, which one is better is a controversial issue. In my view, face-to-face education can bring better results.
First, it is obvious that students could be supervised easily if they study at schools. The essence of human being is laziness. When people choose to study online, they always need more motivation and self-control to push themselves. If not, they are likely to be vulnerable to something interesting, such as social software, computer game and so on. No one could study effectively if they were attracted by these gadgets.
Moreover, people cannot be good with some practical skills by network. For example, in guitar training field, students have to know how to hold it and where to put their hand on clearly. It is difficult and almost impossible for students to get all details over a small camera. Even they do that, they probably copy the behaviors wrongly and teachers hardly correct them especially in a big class rather one on one.
This is not to say that we should give up learning online. Of course, some theoretical courses will be efficient if we choose a suitable teacher and online lessons can save our time in commuting. But still, having a class in college is better for most students.
In sum, attending college can guarantee higher learning efficiency and outcomes.Meanwhile, we should not ignore the convenience of online lessons. Only by combining these two ways with the actual situation can students maintain dynamic development.
July 6, 2020 at 8:30 pmScore: ungraded
I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.
July 8, 2020 at 10:03 amDuring the past decades, the advancement of information technology has significantly facilitated the development of telecommunication. As such, distance-learning has become readily accessible to learners in many parts of the world. However, in my view, face-to-face education still dominates and also brings better results in most cases.
First, it is evident that students could be supervised easily if they study at schools. The essence of humanity is laziness. When people choose to study online, they always need more motivation and self-control to push themselves. If not, they are likely to be vulnerable to something interesting, such as social software, computer game and so on. No one could study effectively if these gadgets attract them.
Moreover, people cannot be good with some practical skills by network. For example, in guitar training field, students have to know how to hold it and where to put their hand on clearly. It is difficult and almost impossible for students to get all details over a small camera. Even they do that, they probably copy the wrong behaviors and teachers hardly correct them especially in a big class rather one on one.
This is not to say that we should give up learning online. Of course, some theoretical courses will be efficient if we choose a suitable teacher. And online lessons can always save our time in commuting. But still, having a class in college is better for most students who want to score higher.
In sum, attending college can guarantee higher learning efficiency and outcomes. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the convenience of online lessons. Only by combining these two ways with the actual situation can students maintain dynamic development.
July 8, 2020 at 9:44 pmDuring the past decades, the advancement of information technology has significantly facilitated the development
of telecommunication[ of the education sector ]. As such, distance-learning has become readily accessible to learners in many parts of the world.However, in[ In ] my view, [ however, ]face-to-faceeducation[ teaching ]still dominates and alsobrings better resultsin most cases[ than those brought by distance learning ].First, it is evident that students could (be supervised easily)[passive/confusing ] if they study [grammatical error ]at schools. The essence of humanity is laziness[ factual flaw ]. (When people choose to study online, they always need more motivation and self-control to push themselves)[logical confusion ]. If not, they are likely to be vulnerable to something interesting[wrong word ], such as social software, computer game and so on. No one could study effectively if these gadgets attract them[ factual error ].
Moreover, people cannot be good with some practical skills by network[ unclear ]. For example, in guitar [ article error ]training field, students have to know how to hold it[unclear pronoun ] and where to put their hand [word form error ]on[preposition error ] clearly. It[unclear pronoun ] is difficult and almost impossible for students (to get all details over a small camera)[ unclear ]. Even they do that[ unclear pronoun ], they probably copy the wrong behaviors and teachers hardly [ wrong adverb ]correct them[ unclear pronoun ] especially in a big class( rather one on one)[ unclear ].
This is not to say that we should give up (learning online)[ conceptual error ]. Of course, (some theoretical courses will be efficient if we choose a suitable teacher)[ logical confusion ]. And [ coordinating word error ]online lessons can always save our time in commuting. But still, having a class in college is better[vauge ] for most students who want to (score higher)[unclear ].
In sum, attending college can guarantee higher learning efficiency and outcomes[ logical confusion ]. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the convenience of online lessons. Only by (combining these two ways with the actual situation)[ unclear ] can students maintain (dynamic development)[ unclear ].
