People’s support towards international aid

These days, many people owe a lot to celebrities who make significant contributions to the welfare industry. By joining philanthropy activities and donating money generously to international aid organizations, they raise awareness of humanity and environmental issues. However, I argue that they neither have a lasting influence, nor do they draw up attention to welfare itself.

People agree with the former idea may have been trapped in an illusion that their idols are the most good-hearted people. They not only give away their assets to those in need but also busily engaged in different campaigns. Many explain this as a natural revealment of some uplifting morals, as if these people are helping for free. They don’t know that this is technically a double-win process. By offering a little cost, which could be a sum of money not hard to earn, they build up a perfect image with immortal souls. This, in the end, would help them to gain more fans and follower, and lead to a brighter career.

In light of this, I only agree with the idea that those famous people are helpful as fund-raisers. But not moral therapists at all. We have been cheated every time whenever huge internet traffic was brought to international aids in a sudden, because these are just temporary-effects produced by devout fans. These fans, following whatever their idols do, simply regard support to the welfare industry as a thing that makes their heroes happy. The enthusiasm would soon drain when the celebrities no longer do it or devote themselves to other activities. And sometimes these celebrities are even too famous that, people are distracted by their gossips rather than the problems. Years ago, the prestigious Chinese singer Faye Wong established a foundation for kids born with an abnormal mouth. The foundation once received support from her fans at the beginning, but very few have kept donating throughout the years. When she divorced years ago and quickly engaged with another actor, the foundation quietly escaped from people’s minds.

Although celebrities encouraged a lot of noble behaviors, which brought attention to humanity process, they are sometimes charm overloaded that they distract people’s attention from the problems.

These days, many people owe a lot to celebrities who make significant contributions to the welfare industry. By joining philanthropy activities and donating money to international aid organisations, they raise awareness of humanity and environmental issues. However, I argue that they do not draw up attention to welfare itself.

People agree with the former idea may fanatically adore their idols as the most good-hearted people. They not only give away their assets to those in need but also engaged in different campaigns. Many explain this as a natural revealment of some uplifting morals, as if these people were helping for free. They don’t know that this is a double-win process. By offering a little cost, which could be a sum of money not hard to earn, they build up a perfect image with immortal souls. This, in the end, would help them to gain more fans and followers, and lead to a brighter career.

In light of this, I only agree with the idea that those famous people are helpful as fund-raisers. But not moral therapists at all. We often astonished at surging internet traffic about international aid produced by devout fans. These fans, following whatever their idols do, regard support to the welfare industry as a thing that makes their heroes happy. The enthusiasm would soon drain when the celebrities no longer do it or devote themselves to other activities. And sometimes these celebrities are even too famous that, people are distracted by their gossips rather than the problems. Years ago, the prestigious Chinese singer Faye Wong established a foundation for kids born with an abnormal mouth. The foundation once received support from her fans at the beginning, but very few have kept donating throughout the years. When she divorced years ago and quickly engaged with another actor, the foundation quietly escaped from people’s minds.

Although celebrities encouraged a lot of noble behaviours, which brought attention to humanity process, they are sometimes charm overloaded that they distract people’s attention from the problems.

Hey, I reread my essay and I found that my 2nd paragraph strayed from the question.

So I made a significant change and here’s the new one.

Hopefully, it will look better!

These days, many people owe a lot to celebrities in that they draw great attention to the welfare industry. However, my opinion is of the opposite, and I argue that they make humanity issues less important.

To many people, famous people seem to be helpful in raising awareness of societal issues. This is because they are often seen joining different awareness campaigns and donating a huge amount of money to NGOs. In most cases, they are invited by or cooperated with the sponsor, since their outstanding reputation can easily attract the attention of social media. Problems are visible to people through high-frequency reports and exposure. For example, Emma Watson once joined a speech in UN about feminism, which had been reported worldwide. Hundreds of thousands of people had joined the discussion after the report.

However, we can hardly say celebrities make problems much more significant. Instead, they distract a lot of followers to themselves. Fanatical fans, following whatever their idols do, often regard support to the welfare industry as a way to please their heroes. Their enthusiasm for humanity soon drains when new albums or gossips coming out. Years ago, the prestigious Chinese singer Faye Wong established a foundation for kids born with an abnormal mouth. The foundation once received support from her fans at the beginning, but very few have kept donating throughout the years. When she divorced years ago and quickly engaged with another actor, attention to the foundation quietly escaped from people’s minds.

Seeing through the data requires us to observe in the long term. Although famous people attract people’s attention to different problems, they do not make them more significant. In contrast, these people are stealing the focus.