Scientists believe that finding other life forms in space by sending messages is a good idea while others think it can be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
-
February 21, 2020 at 10:51 am
Scientists believe that finding other life forms in space by sending messages is a good idea while others think it can be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
During the past decades, public around the world have debated on whether we should deliver information to seek for outer space creatures. Many believe in such method, while others hold the opposite view. To my mind, I totally agree with the opponents.
First and foremost, the transmitting of our messages to the space would give rise to hazards and even potential destruction of our civilization because an alien culture, which has far advanced technologies and supreme intelligence, might impose an imminent threat to our society, if we fail to take precautions against such peril. One danger is that their technologies could lead to disasters and other assumption is that they might enslave us. Despite the calamities, some of our scientists also suggest that even if this alien civilized world has no malicious intentions, the organisms associated with them, virus or bacteria for instance would cause an incurable pandemic inadvertently and as a result, human beings could be in danger.
As is illustrated, I argue that we should abandon such insensible ways, rather, we have better alternative approaches to further our understanding of other life in universe. A further reason is that researchers have found that delivering messages has proved to be of no avail and inefficient in that we have to wait for years to receive the responses and the chance is scant. Another consideration is that we have explored the moon and Mars by using space crafts and other detection robots, which produce more useful information to us. In addition, there are hundreds of observatory stations around the world, receiving and collecting significant information from the universe, which usually have exciting news regarding possible target planets with other life forms.
In conclusion, we must reconsider the idea of discovering other creatures by sending information. Instead, we should prefer other options.
February 21, 2020 at 1:05 pmModified Version
During the past decades, public around the world have debated on whether we should deliver information to seek for outer space creatures. Many believe in such method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, I suggest we have better ways to discover other beings.
First and foremost, the transmitting of our messages to the space would give rise to hazards and even potential destruction of our civilization if we fail to take precautions against such peril, an alien culture, which has far advanced technologies and supreme intelligence, might impose an imminent threat to our society. Therefore, more cautious opinion (the second view) is more reasonable. Some of our scientists also suggest that even if this extraordinary world has no malicious intentions, the organisms accompanied with them, virus or bacteria for instance would cause an unexpected pandemic and as a result, human beings could be in danger. In addition, researchers have found that delivering messages has proved to be of no avail and inefficient in that we have to wait for years to receive the responses and the chance is scant.
As is illustrated, I argue that we should abandon such insensible way, rather, we should choose alternative approaches to deepen our understanding of other life patterns in universe. For example, we have explored the moon and Mars by using space crafts and other detection robots, which collect more useful information to us and conduct dozens of experiments for us. Furthermore, there are hundreds of observatory stations around the world, receiving and collecting significant astronomical data from the universe, which sometimes provide exciting reports regarding possible target planets with potential beings. Through these ways, we can have enough knowledge about these aliens to be well prepared proactively before they visit us.
In conclusion, we must reconsider the idea of discovering other creatures by sending information to cosmos due to potential risks. Instead, we should prefer other options.
February 21, 2020 at 1:41 pmFurther Modified
During the past decades, public around the world have debated on whether we should deliver information to seek for outer space creatures. Many believe in such method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, I suggest we have better ways to make such discovery.
First and foremost, the transmitting of our messages to the space would give rise to hazards and even potential destruction of our civilization if we fail to take precautions against such peril. To be more specific, an alien culture, which has far advanced technologies and supreme intelligence, might impose an imminent threat to our society. Therefore, more cautious opinion (the second view) is more reasonable. Some of our scientists also suggest that even if this extraordinary world has no malicious intentions, the organisms accompanied with them, virus or bacteria for instance would cause an unexpected pandemic. As a result, human beings could be in danger. In addition, researchers have found that delivering messages has proved to be of no avail and inefficient in that we have to wait for years to receive the responses and the chance is scant.
As is illustrated, I argue that we should abandon such insensible way, rather, we should choose alternative approaches to deepen our understanding of other life patterns in universe. For example, we have explored the moon and Mars by using space crafts and other detection robots, which collect more useful information to us and conduct dozens of experiments for us. Furthermore, there are hundreds of observatory stations around the world, receiving and collecting significant astronomical data from the universe, which sometimes provide exciting reports regarding possible target planets with potential beings. Through these ways, we can have enough knowledge about these aliens to be well prepared proactively before they visit us.
In conclusion, we must reconsider the idea of discovering other creatures by sending information to cosmos due to potential risks. Instead, we should prefer other options.
February 21, 2020 at 1:42 pmCorrect few errors,
During the past decades, public around the world have debated on whether we should deliver information to seek for outer space creatures. Many believe in such method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, I suggest we have better ways to make such discoveries.
First and foremost, the transmitting of our messages to the space would give rise to hazards and even potential destruction of our civilization if we fail to take precautions against such peril. To be more specific, an alien culture, which has far advanced technologies and supreme intelligence, might impose an imminent threat to our society. Therefore, more cautious opinion (the second view) is more reasonable. Some of our scientists also suggest that even if this extraordinary world has no malicious intentions, the organisms accompanied with them, virus or bacteria for instance would cause an unexpected pandemic. As a result, human beings could be in danger. In addition, researchers have found that delivering messages has proved to be of no avail and inefficient in that we have to wait for years to receive the responses and the chance is scant.
As is illustrated, I argue that we should abandon such insensible way, rather, we should choose alternative approaches to deepen our understanding of other life patterns in universe. For example, we have explored the moon and Mars by using space crafts and other detection robots, which collect more useful information to us and conduct dozens of experiments for us. Furthermore, there are hundreds of observatory stations around the world, receiving and collecting significant astronomical data from the universe, which sometimes provide exciting reports regarding possible target planets with potential beings. Through these ways, we can have enough knowledge about these aliens to be well prepared proactively before they visit us.
In conclusion, we must reconsider the idea of discovering other creatures by sending information to cosmos due to potential risks. Instead, we should prefer other options.
February 22, 2020 at 3:44 amScore: 50.8
Issues:
- More than 50% of the sentences exceed 20 words. Shorten/split them.
- More than 10% of the sentences are passive. Convert some of them into their active counterparts.
I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.
February 23, 2020 at 9:33 amDuring the past decades, the public has debated about the transmission of radio waves to seek other creatures outside the earth. Many believe in this method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, we should reconsider it to avoid potential risks and choose other ways instead.
The experience shows that this approach works inefficiently and has its own limit. Firstly, we have received no responses from extra-terrestrial beings so far. Secondly, only intelligent aliens will respond to us accordingly. Consequently, we will remain ignorant about other terrestrial organisms. By contrast, the cautious opinion sounds more reasonable due to possible perils. One of the dangers could be a widespread pandemic. If unknown intelligent beings visit us, even without malicious intentions, viruses or bacteria accompanying them will cause an unexpected worldwide outbreak of a deadly disease. As a result, human beings could be in danger. Furthermore, their misused technologies will probably destroy our world.
Therefore, I argue that we need to give more considerations about it. Apart from these dangers, we refuse to squander large amounts of money on these projects. Actually, we have already had more effective and useful discovering methods. For example, we have explored other planets by using satellites, rovers and other detection robots. And the information sent back by these machines have continuously enriched our knowledge of other life forms. Astronomical observatories on earth also provide significant reports on possible target planets with living organisms. The more we understand about these alien creatures, the better we prepare against future perils.
In conclusion, we should think twice about the idea of discovering other beings by sending information to the outer space due to potential risks. Hence, we ought to prefer other options.
February 24, 2020 at 3:59 amScientists believe that finding other life forms in space by sending messages is a good idea while others think it can be dangerous. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
During the past decades, the public has debated about the transmission of radio waves to seek other creatures outside the earth. Many believe in this method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, we should reconsider it to avoid potential risks and choose other ways instead.
The experience shows that this approach works inefficiently and has its own limit. Firstly, we have received no responses from extra-terrestrial beings so far. Secondly, only intelligent aliens will respond to us accordingly. Consequently, we will remain ignorant about other terrestrial organisms. By contrast, the cautious opinion sounds more reasonable due to possible perils. One of the dangers could be a widespread pandemic. If unknown intelligent beings visit us, even without malicious intentions, viruses or bacteria accompanying them will cause an unexpected worldwide outbreak of a deadly disease. As a result, human beings could be in danger. Furthermore, their misused technologies will probably destroy our world.
Therefore, I argue that we need to give more considerations about it. Apart from these dangers, we refuse to squander large amounts of money on these projects. Actually, we have already had more effective and useful discovering methods. For example, we have explored other planets by using satellites, rovers and other detection robots. And the information sent back by these machines have continuously enriched our knowledge of other life forms. Astronomical observatories on earth also provide significant reports on possible target planets with living organisms. The more we understand about these alien creatures, the better we prepare against future perils.
In conclusion, we should think twice about the idea of discovering other beings by sending information to the outer space due to potential risks. Rather, we ought to prefer other options.
February 24, 2020 at 9:45 amThe Write Topic is not my topic. My topic is
Scientists believe that finding other life forms in space by sending messages is a good idea while others think it can be dangerous. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Please check it again.
During the past decades, the public has debated about the transmission of radio waves to seek other creatures outside the earth. Many believe in this method, while others argue we take risks to do so. To my mind, we should reconsider it to avoid potential risks and choose other ways instead.
The experience shows that this approach works inefficiently and has its own limit. Firstly, we have received no responses from extra-terrestrial beings so far. Secondly, only intelligent aliens will respond to us accordingly. Consequently, we will remain ignorant about other terrestrial organisms. By contrast, the cautious opinion sounds more reasonable due to possible perils. One of the dangers could be a widespread pandemic. If unknown intelligent beings visit us, even without malicious intentions, viruses or bacteria accompanying them will cause an unexpected worldwide outbreak of a deadly disease. As a result, human beings could be in danger. Furthermore, their misused technologies will probably destroy our world.
Therefore, I argue that we need to give more considerations about it. Apart from these dangers, we refuse to squander large amounts of money on these projects. Actually, we have already had more effective and useful discovering methods. For example, we have explored other planets by using satellites, rovers and other detection robots. And the information sent back by these machines have continuously enriched our knowledge of other life forms. Astronomical observatories on earth also provide significant reports on possible target planets with living organisms. The more we understand about these alien creatures, the better we prepare against future perils.
In conclusion, we should think twice about the idea of discovering other beings by sending information to the outer space due to potential risks. Rather, we ought to prefer other options.
February 24, 2020 at 10:07 pmScore: 51.3
During the past decades, the public has debated [ tense error ] about [ factual error/never heard of it/don’t fabricate something to conflict with truth ] the [ article error ] transmission [ word form error ] of radio waves [ logical incompleteness ] to seek other creatures outside the earth. Many believe in this method [unclear ] , while others argue [ pronoun error ] we take risks to do so. To [wrong word ] my mind, we should reconsider it [ unclear pronoun ] to avoid potential risks and choose other ways instead.
The experience shows that this approach works [ grammatical error ] inefficiently and has its own limit. Firstly, we have received no responses [ word form error ] from extra-terrestrial beings so far. Secondly, only intelligent aliens will [absolute statement ] respond to us accordingly [ wrong adverb ] . Consequently, [ wrong adverb ] we will [tense error ] remain ignorant about other terrestrial organisms.
By contrast, the cautious opinion [ unclear ] sounds more reasonable due to possible perils [ logical incompleteness ] . One of the dangers could be a widespread pandemic. If [article error ] unknown intelligent beings visit us, even without malicious intentions, viruses or bacteria accompanying them will [absolute statement/use conditional writing ] cause an unexpected, (worldwide outbreak of a deadly disease) [lethal pandemic ] . As a result, human beings could be in danger. Furthermore, their [ unclear pronoun ] misused technologies will probably destroy our world. [ lacking supporting details ]
Therefore, I argue that we need to give more considerations about it [unclear pronoun ] . Apart from these dangers, we refuse to squander large amounts of money on these projects.
Actually, [ too many adverbs used ] we have already had more effective and useful discovering methods. For example, we have explored other planetsbyusing satellites, rovers and other detection robots. [ punctuation error concerning coordinating word ] And the information sent back by/from these machines have [ grammatical error ] continuously enriched our knowledge of other life forms. Astronomical observatories on earth also provide significant [ wrong word ] reports on possible target planets with living organisms. The more we understandaboutthese alien creatures, the better we prepare against future perils.In conclusion, we should think twice about the idea of discovering other beings by sending information to the outer space due to its associated potential risks. Rather, we ought to prefer other options.
