Some people prefer to live in a house, while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to living in a house rather than in an apartment?
-
June 12, 2020 at 12:22 am
Some people prefer to live in a house, while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages to living in a house rather than in an apartment?
An overwhelming number of people need to find somewhere to reside in modern society. Some people prefer houses while others tend to choose apartments. As such, governments should encourage local residents to live in apartments because benefits exceed the demerits.
There are sound reasons why people prefer the houses especially for the wealthy. On the one hand, self-construction mode allows people more freedom for their accommodation. This is because they could figure out architectural patterns, garden designs and interior creations by themselves. In this way, people could fulfill their emptiness, lift their moods and enrich cultural life during the process. On the other hand, house plays more significant role in promoting economic progress. To be specific, the whole gamut from furnitures, plants to paintings are required during the constructing and decoration of high-quality houses, bringing huge influx of income to relevant industries and stimulating economic growth.
People should comply to city planning and live in apartments for a number of reasons. The first is that the security of residents should be highlighted. If people are capable of building whatever style as their will does, the quality cannot be ensured. Government, however, could provide sufficient sponsorship to apartments construction and due diligence to their safety. Besides, relocating homeowners to dense-populated apartments can vacate much land in city center. It follows that these precious resources could extend the limited use or fortify nation’s welfare. Also, dwellers away from concrete jungles may suffer from the inconvenience of transportation to work.
In conclusion, it is a plausible way for indigent people to live on the apartment provided by the government, while people should purchase or construct affordable houses if possible.
June 12, 2020 at 11:05 pmScore: ungraded
Issues:
- About 10% of the sentences are passive. Convert some of them into their active counterparts.
I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.
June 17, 2020 at 3:44 amAn overwhelming number of people need to find somewhere to live in modern society. Some people prefer houses, while others tend to choose apartments. As such, citizens had better choose apartments because benefits exceed the demerits.
There are sound reasons why people prefer houses especially for the wealthy. For one thing, self-construction mode allows people more freedom for their accommodation. That is because they can figure out garden designs and interior creations on their own. In this way, people could fulfill emptiness, lift their moods, and enrich cultural life. For another, houses play a more significant role in promoting economic progress. To be specific, the whole gamut from furnitures, plants to paintings are required during the decoration process. That brings a huge influx of income to relevant industries and stirs economic growth.
People should comply with city planning and live in apartments for several reasons. The first is that the security of residents counts. If people can build whatever style as their will does, the quality cannot be ensured. The government, however, can sponsor the project and due diligence to its safety. Besides, accomodating people to high buildings can vacate much land in the city . It follows that these precious land resources could extend their limited use and fortify the nation’s welfare. Also, workers away from concrete jungles may suffer from inconvenient transportation.
In conclusion, it is a plausible way for people to construct houses for residential use. However, we can entrust the state to build apartments due to their safety and efficiency.
June 17, 2020 at 10:19 pmAn overwhelming number of people need to find somewhere to live in modern society. Some people prefer houses, while others
tend tochoose apartments. As such[ wrong transitory word ], citizens had better choose apartments because benefits exceed the demerits[ wrong word ]. [ Irrelevant/you need to discuss the advantages/disadvantages of living in houses rather than apartments. ]There are sound reasons why people prefer houses (especially for the wealthy)[misplaced/confusing ]. For one thing, (self-construction mode)[ unclear ] allows [ wrong word/ allow…to ]people more freedom for their accommodation. That is because they can figure out garden designs and interior (creations)[ wrong word ] on their own. In this way, people could (fulfill emptiness)[ unclear ], lift their moods, and enrich cultural life. For another, houses (play a more significant role in promoting)[wordy/use one verb ] economic progress. To be specific, the whole gamut from furnitures[ word form error ], plants to paintings are required during the decoration process. That brings a huge influx of income to relevant industries and [ wrong coordination word ]stirs economic growth.
People should comply with city planning and live in apartments for several reasons. The first is that
thesecurity of residents counts. If people can build whatever style as their will does, the quality cannot be ensured.[ grammatical error with subjunctive voice ]The government,[ Government ]however, can sponsor the project and due diligence to its safety[ unclear ]. Besides, accomodating people to high buildings can vacate much land in the city . [ spacing error ]It[ unclear pronoun ] follows that these precious land resources could extend their limited use and (fortify the nation’s welfare)[ unclear ]. (Also, workers away from concrete jungles may suffer from inconvenient transportation.)[ unclear ]In conclusion, it is a plausible way for people to construct houses for residential use. However, we can entrust the state to build apartments due to their safety and efficiency.
