Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find the most interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people insist teenagers should concentrate on all subejescts instead of the subject they prefer. while others hold a different view, I am in favor of balancing all sunjects.

To begin with, nobody is an island, so do subjects, they interact with each other. That’s common in learning process, for example, memorizing chemical elements is easier with knowing their English expressions. In the meanwhile, chemical elements give hints for spelling by offering initial letters. What’s more, problems concerning various subjects are commonplace, as in English reading, it’s much easier to comprehend articles with overall knowledge.

Then, concentrating on all subejects forces them to diffrentiate solutions to various problems due to their charateristics. These practice enhance their abilities to tackle problems and enable them to view things from muitiple perspectives. Besides, balacing all subjects is always linked with integrated developement. They learn not only liberal arts, full of philosophic theories, but also science, cosisting of truthes. That kind of education tends to foster erudite and learned students. Last, students focusing on all subjects relatively approach companies’ requirements for elites with a wide range of knowlege. Therefore, they may face a better job prospect in the future.

On the other hand, focusing on the subject they like or are good at drives more passion and enthusasm for study. So they are prone to take intiative to study rather than to be forced by others. Moreover, in-depth study on one subject are likely to make them experts in their fields apiece.

In conclusion, I think teenagers should be engrossed on all subjects instead of one subject, though the latter one are more interesting and enable them to specialize in one subject.

There has been a debate about the range of subjects students should learn.  Some people insist students should concentrate on all subjects instead of focusing on the subject they prefer. While others hold a different view. I totally agree with balancing all subjects.

One benefit of balancing all subjects is that it enables students accessible to extensive knowledge. And this process prompts them to broaden their horizon and the scope of knowledge. Moreover, learning all subjects means more possibilities, especially in university.  For example, you don’t know that you may be talented in one subject without learning it. Besides, numerous worker realize what they learnt at school is very useful even those they deem futile in the past.   Another benefit is that concentrating on all subjects is likely to achive the all-round development of students. Those elites possessing a wider range of knowledge are just the requirements of many large companies. Therefore, they are prone to face better job prospect in the future.

On the other hand, focusing on the subject they prefer can drive more passion for study. Thus most of them take initiatives to study rather than being pushed by parents and teachers. In addition, in-depth study on one subject makes it impossible for them to become experts in their own fields apiece.

In my view, students had better concentrate on all subejects so that they can become learned and erudite. In the meantime, they can find their potential and develop in an all-round way during the procedure. Although favourite subjects excites more ethusiasm for study.

There has been a debate about the range of subjects students should learn.  Some people insist students should concentrate on all subjects instead of focusing on the subject they prefer. While others hold a different view. I  agree with balancing all courses.

One benefit of balancing all subjects is that it enables students to learn extensive knowledge. And this process prompts them to broaden their horizon and the scope of learning. Moreover, learning all curriculum means more possibilities, especially at university.  For example, you may realize that you are talented in one subject and get the orientation of your future while learning it. Besides, numerous workers realize what they  learnt at school is very useful, even those they deem futile in the past.   Another benefit is that concentrating on all subjects is likely to achieve the all-round development of students. Those elites possessing a wider range of knowledge satisfy the requirements of many large companies. Therefore, they are prone to face better job prospects in the future.

On the other hand, focusing on the course they prefer can drive more passion for study. Thus most of students take initiatives to study rather than being pushed by parents and teachers. In addition, thorough study on one subject makes it impossible for them to become experts in their own fields apiece.

In my view, students had better concentrate on all subjects so that they can become learned and erudite. In the meantime, they can find their potential and develop in an all-round way during the procedure. Although favourite subjects excite more enthusiasm for study.