Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
-
March 31, 2022 at 3:23 pm
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is hard to deny that the television advertising created lots of profits for companies, and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that the television advertising should be developed more. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as humanity, efficiency, and quality are concerned, I strongly hold that the television advertising should be forbidden.
First and foremost, the advertising betrays the principle of humanity, as it takes advantage of the love of parents to children and gets children to persuade their parents to buy. Meanwhile, the perception of children is childish and immature, easy to mislead. It is apparent that the companies just need to take some impressive advertising shows like some cartoon characters for tricking children, and then the children would beg their parents to buy the products for them. Not to mention that most parents would buy the products because they love their children! The way of cheating for sale is inhuman and should be forbidden.
Furthermore, the fact that the reliability of people to advertising has been going down indicates that the way of cheating for sale is inadvisable. Take the case of Crest toothpaste, which advertised that “whiten teeth in just one day” and employed the famous actress Elephant Dee as spokesperson on TV, however, it is a trick that the white teeth just was photoshopped after that. As a result, the company was punished by the government with 3 million CNY. What the company lost is not only the money but also the reputation. Think about, who will buy the products from a notorious company? All of those interpret that it is ineffective to cheat consumers for sale.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that whatever stimulating consumption can improve economic growth. Ironically, the price of short-time economic growth is a decline in quality, because the attention of companies to cheating consumers causes the neglect of the quality, and then the consumers would never buy those products whose quality is shoddy. Eventually, that will be harmful to long-term economic growth.
April 2, 2022 at 8:31 pmFix the issues suggested on the screenshot reviews and then resubmit the essay.
April 4, 2022 at 4:31 pmTelevision advertising directed towards young children created lots of profits for companies, and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that the advertising should be developed further. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. As far as humanity, efficiency, and quality are concerned, I strongly hold that advertising directed toward young children should be forbidden.
First and foremost, the advertising betrays the principle of humanity, as it takes advantage of love for children and gets children to persuade their parents to buy. Meanwhile, the psyche of children is childish and immature, easy to mislead. It is apparent that the companies only need to take some impressive advertising shows like some cartoon characters for attracting children’s attention, and then the children would beg their parents to buy the products for them. Not to mention that most parents would buy the products because if they don’t, their children will cry and scream to make them crazy. Therefore, the way of using children for sale is inhuman and should be forbidden.
Furthermore, the fact that the reliability of people to advertising has been going down indicates that the way is inadvisable and will further reduce the reliability. Take the case of the Crest toothpaste, which advertised “whiten teeth in just one day” and employed the famous actress Elephant Dee as spokesperson on TV, but it is a trick as the white teeth just were added by the computer after that. Finally, Crest’s company was punished by the government with 3 million CNY. In addition, what the company lost is not only the money but also its reputation. Think about it, who will buy products from a notorious company? Using children for sale violates the law of some places and will make people feel cheated, too.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that whatever stimulating consumption can improve economic growth. Ironically, the cost of short-time economic growth is a decline in quality, because the attention of companies to trick consumers causes the neglect of quality, and the consumers would never buy those products whose quality is shoddy anymore. Eventually, that will be harmful to long-term economic growth. Therefore, for the quality of products and long-term economic growth, the trick should be banned.
April 13, 2022 at 2:04 amTelevision advertising directed towards young children
created[ generates ]lots of[informal – considerable ] profits for companies, and such a fact leads (impressionable people)[ ? ] togenerate the opinion[believe ]thatthe(advertising should be developed further)[ unclear ]. (However,such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies.)[ Use your own words to write ] (As far as humanity, efficiency, and quality are concerned,)[ unclear ] I strongly hold that (advertising directed toward young children)[ repetition ] should be forbidden.First
and foremost, (the advertising)[unclear ] betrays the principle of humanity, as[unclear word – since ] it takes advantage of[ article error ] love for children and gets children to persuade their parents to buy. Meanwhile, the psyche of children is childish and immature, (easy to mislead)[ grammatical error ].It[unclear pronoun ]is apparent that(the companies)[unclear ] only (need to take some impressive advertising shows like some cartoon characters for attracting children’s attention)[ unclear/rewrite ], and then the children would beg their parents to buy the products for them. [grammatical error ]Not to mention that most parents would buy the products because if they don’t, their children will cry and scream to make them[unclear pronoun ] crazy. Therefore, (the way of using children for sale)[unclear ] is inhuman and should be forbidden.Furthermore, (the fact that the reliability of people to advertising)[ grammatical error ] has been going down indicates that (the way)[ unclear ] is inadvisable and will [ unparalleled ]further reduce the reliability[ unclear ]. Take the case of the Crest toothpaste[ grammatical error ], which advertised “whiten teeth in just one day” and employed the famous actress Elephant Dee as [ article error ]spokesperson on TV, but it [ unclear pronoun ]is a trick as[unclear word ] the white teeth just[word improperly placed ] were added by the[article error ] computer after that[unclear pronoun ]. Finally, Crest’s company was punished by the government with[ unclear preposition ] 3 million CNY. In addition, what the company lost is not only
themoney but alsoitsreputation. Think about it[unclear pronoun ], [punctuation error ]who will buy products from a notorious company? Using children for sale violates( the law of some places)[ unclear ] and will [ unparalleled ]make people feel cheated, too.Nevertheless, (a voice arises)[ ? ] that (whatever stimulating consumption)[ ? ] can improve economic growth. Ironically, the cost of short-time economic growth is a decline in quality,[ punctuation error ] because (the attention of companies to trick)[ unclear ] consumers causes the neglect of quality, and
theconsumers would never buy those products whose quality is shoddy anymore[confusing sentence ]. Eventually, that [ unclear pronoun ]will (be harmful)[use active verb ] to long-term economic growth. Therefore, for the quality of products and long-term economic growth,( the trick)[ ? ] should be banned.April 13, 2022 at 2:23 amFinal revision
