The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. IELTS Writing The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

  • Amaya
    University: Beijing Foreign Studies University
    Nationality: China
    May 15, 2024 at 2:19 am

    The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

    In a time marked by unprecedented technological advancements, it becomes imperative to reflect on the aims of scientific endeavors. While some prioritize the improvement of people’s lives, I contend this perspective.

    ​Admittedly, many scientific discoveries have been a great boon to people’s lives. Without the scientific breakthrough made by Alan Turing, father of modern computer and artificial intelligence, we couldn’t have been able to enjoy the ease of the smart machine that facilitates our work and daily life with its massive computing capacity. Also consider Dr. Yuan Longping, father of hybrid rice, thanks to whose contribution the production of rice has more than doubled in many regions and over a third of the world’s population enjoy food security. Cases alike abound, where science serves to improve livelihood in one way or another.

    ​Nonetheless, I find it injudicious to claim that the improvement of people’s life is an goal of paramount importance for scientists. Sciences have never been and should never be utilitarian or totally outcome-oriented. Imagine the preeminent scientists like Einstein and Newton pursuing this sole end in their research endeavours. There would probably be no uncovering of the theory of Relativity and Laws of Motion. These discoveries might not benefit the livelihood of the public in a palpable way, but they have undoubtedly paved the way for further development of the other important scientific or technological breakthroughs, and contributed to human’s better understanding of the universe at large. Similarly, space exploration, though seemingly unrelated to the public, enhances nations’ power and global presence, with vast potential in the unknown. These projects, though not immediately beneficial or cost-effective, are crucial for long-term societal and state advancement.

    ​In conclusion, science is aimed at improving livelihood and beyond. The understanding the laws ruling the world, and the exploration of untapped extraterrestrial territory, for example, do not engender immediate benefits, but lay a solid foundation for the betterment of mankind, and prove imperative for the nation as a whole and posterities of our kind.

    May 15, 2024 at 2:36 am

    In a time marked by unprecedented technological advancements, it becomes imperative to reflect on the aims of scientific endeavors. While some prioritize the improvement of people’s lives, I contend this perspective.

    ​Admittedly, many scientific discoveries have been a great boon to people’s lives. Without the scientific breakthrough made by Alan Turing, father [ a major contributor to  ]of modern computer and artificial intelligence, we couldn’t [ wouldn’t  ] have been able to enjoy the ease of the smart machine that facilitates our work and daily life with its massive computing capacity. Also consider Dr. Yuan Longping, father[ developer  ] of hybrid rice, thanks to whose contribution the production of rice has more than doubled in many regions [ across the globe,  ] and over a third of the world’s population enjoy food security. Cases alike abound, where science serves to improve livelihood in one way or another.

    ​Nonetheless, I find it injudicious to claim that the improvement of people’s life[lives   ] is an goal of paramount importance for scientists. Sciences have never been and should never be utilitarian or totally outcome-oriented. Imagine the preeminent scientists like Einstein and Newton pursuing this sole end in their research endeavours. There would probably be no uncovering of the theory of Relativity and Laws of Motion. These discoveries might not benefit the livelihood of the public in a palpable way, but they have undoubtedly paved the way for further development of the other important scientific or technological breakthroughs, and contributed to human’s better understanding of the universe at large. Similarly, space exploration, though seemingly unrelated to the public, enhances nations’ power and global presence, with vast potential in the unknown. These projects, though not immediately beneficial or cost-effective, are crucial for long-term societal and state advancement.

    ​In conclusion, science is aimed at improving livelihood and beyond. The understanding [  of ]the laws ruling the world, and the exploration of untapped extraterrestrial territory, for example, do not engender immediate benefits, but lay a solid foundation for the betterment of mankind, and prove imperative for the nation as a whole and posterities of our kind.

    May 15, 2024 at 2:50 am

    Final revision. Good job!