The rapid growth of cities has a mostly positive impact on the development of the society.

Recent years have seen the tremendous expansion of the metropolises. Therefore, some people advocate that this urban sprawl is of benefit to society. I disagree.

Admittedly, many new opportunities are opening up with a rapid urban growth. One is that city dwellers have access to more chance of getting a decent job. From world-famous companies, investment banks, film studios to local factories, they all prefer big cities, therefore providing various jobs for all kinds of job seekers in cities. Communities can also benefit from adapting historic buildings to suit modern needs. As the rehabilitation of the Vogue Theatre in Manistee, Michigan, shows, renovating such buildings can be a source of community spirit and economic growth.

However, if a city continues to grow at a phenomenal rate, it has more negative effects than positive ones. Ongoing rapid urbanization usually contributes to a deterioration in the living standards. This has primarily happened due to the mass migration to cities. Because of a surge of immigrants, local cities don’t have a corresponding increase in resources such as education, health care and other amenities. As a result, governments may run the risk of inadequate schools and insufficient budget to cover rising social welfare costs. It is thus unsurprising that one-third of the urban population in developing countries resides in slum conditions.

Urban growth also brings negative impacts on the local environment. Since it is hard to accommodate this rapid expansion in urban-dwelling, the supply of housing can’t keep up with demand. As a result, inner-city rents soar and drive people, especially those less well-off, to live on the outskirts of cities where rent is lower. Affordable homes come at the expense of convenient traffic. People have to spend long hours on trains, private cars or buses day in and day out. What is worse, Vehicle missions will cause air pollution, leading to severe respiratory diseases such as asthma. By contrast, if urban development slows down, these problems could be resolved by building satellite cities, a measure aims to help diffuse the population, enlarge infrastructure and limit the number of cars in the city.

The long-running issue of whether the rapid growth of cities nowadays is mostly a positive development for society surfaced again recently. Some people may take side with it, But a few are more skeptical, asserting that urbanization do not come without a cost. I agree with the latter.

Admittedly,  the rapid urban growth has made numerous desirable changes in cities. One is that city /urban  dwellers have access to more chances of getting a decent job. From world-famous companies, investment banks, film studios to local factories, all of them would prefer big cities, therefore providing  many jobs for job seekers in cities. Communities can also benefit from adapting historic buildings to modern needs. As the rehabilitation of the Vogue Theatre in Manistee, Michigan, shows, renovating such buildings fosters  community spirit and  facilitates  economic growth.

However, rapid city expansion also brings  more negative effects than positive ones. For instance,  mass migration to cities  can reduce urban educational, health care and living standards due to limited available resources.  Since accommodating   this rapid expansion in urban-dwelling  requires/involves expanded residential capacities, the supply of housing may not keep up with the demand. As a result, leasing price rises, which drives less well-off immigrants to live on the outskirts of cities where rent is lower. What’s worse, some immigrants crowd into shared houses or even sleeping in garden sheds and garages.  It is thus unsurprising that one-third of the urban population in developing countries resides in slum conditions.

Urban sprawl also brings /creates  negative impact on the local environment.  Many modern cities are crowded, traffic-ridden, polluted and devoid of green spaces. The increasing use of private cars,  most of which are powered by fossil fuels,  creates a variety of serious environmental problems, such as global warming, acid rains, and urban smog.  The particles released by the incomplete burning of fossil fuels give rise to urban smog, which cause many respiratory diseases, for instance, asthma. The infamous smog of London in the 1950s is a case in point.

Opinions differ as to whether the rapid growth of cities nowadays is mostly a positive development for society. Some may take side with it; but a few are more skeptical, asserting that urbanization does not come without a cost. I agree with the latter.

Admittedly,  the rapid urban growth has made numerous desirable changes in cities. One is that city dwellers have access to more chances of getting a decent job. From world-famous companies, investment banks, film studios to local factories, all of them prefer big cities, therefore providing many jobs for job seekers in cities. Communities can also benefit from adapting historic buildings to modern needs. As the rehabilitation of the Vogue Theatre in Manistee, Michigan, shows, renovating such buildings fosters community spirit and facilitates economic growth.

However, rapid city expansion brings more negative effects than positive ones. A typical case in point is mass migration to cities, which can lead to insufficient schools, increased health care costs and a deterioration in living standards due to limited available resources. Since accommodating this rapid expansion in urban dwelling requires expanded residential capacities, the supply of housing may not keep up with the demand. As a result, a rise in leasing prices drives some less well-off immigrants to live on the outskirts of cities. Other immigrants end up crowding into shared houses or even sleeping in garden sheds and garages. It is thus unsurprising that one-third of the urban population in developing countries resides in slum conditions.

Urban sprawl also creates negative impact on the local environment. Many modern cities are crowded, traffic-ridden, polluted and devoid of green spaces. The increasing use of private cars, most of which are powered by fossil fuels, creates global warming, acid rains, and urban smog. The particles released by the incomplete burning of fossil fuels give rise to urban smog, which causes many respiratory diseases such as asthma. The infamous smog of London in the 1950s is a case in point.