The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.

The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.

The writer says that the well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. Regardless of some details about statement, the basic logic of this sentence must be approved, with which some discussion has to be processed on the basic principle. We can see the questioning spirit undergirds the veins of scientific and humanistic development in human society, but tampering also happens when it would transgress some ethic principles. We will underlie three main points of view to organize this paper, on which more details and points would be interchangeably debated below. We will explain why the skepticism plays an essential role in different eras in the first paragraph, and also show you the evil results when ethic and moral rules are under transgression in the next paragraph, and the fourth paragraph tells what the interaction between rules and skeptical spirit is like along the vicissitudinous time.

Reasonably skepticism has been contributing to the science and humanity for a long time, which would be substantiated by a lot of benchmarks in scientific textbook, especially when it comes to astrology and physics.  With the length limit, we will just extend the discussion concerning humanistic spirits and its relevant academics in history. One enlightened example exists in the oringination and consolidating of Christian, especially among the conflicts between the mainstream and its heretic branches. The Roman dictator Constantane established Grand conference to unite the churches, in which different opinions engendered by reasonable doubt coagulate to flourish the holy theories.  What we want to elucidate by that fact is skepticism regulated by ethnic and moral rules and followed by cooperative communication would boost the development of knowledge, both scientifically and humanistically.

The other side of my view spontaneously can be stated: does the questioning process surpass relevant lines, catastrophe would be released by the corresponding movement. Just as the Crusade war, which is the counterpart to the Constaintane’s Conference, crushed the framework of negotiating and resorted to violence bringing anguishing experience to mid-eval people. The toll we have been tormented have taught us again and again, cooperative framework must be guarded to maintain our peace.

Last, it is not sensible to regard the framework and skepticism as static conception, although there are entrenched rules in different cultures, because the line between these two blurs sometimes and has been variegated along the history. In the ancient time, Christians has been ruled tougher and more stringently than modern days, where framework of skepticism and discussion has been tautened to a large extent. So it would be necessary for the modern people, especially philosophers to refine the demarcation of these two conceptions, which permits us to have both sufficient talking freedom and resilient security-bumper.

So, we must consider the skepticism as multi-faced thing which need to be processed under well-designed mechanisms. Only after we aptly use it , Can its hospitable edge serve us. The well-being of society will be enhanced by questioning, with our effort to maintain a superlative ainstitution.