TOEFL TPO 22 Integrated Writing: ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline
-
October 16, 2019 at 12:31 pm
TOEFL TPO 22 Integrated Writing: ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline.
The author lists 3 reasons that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them are reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide just like gasoline. But the professor states that the ethanol is made from the plant. And the plant can absorb carbon dioxide themselves which reduce the carbon dioxide. So the first reason can be wrong.
Secondly, the professor challenges that the plant which is used to produce the ethanol is not the farm animals’ food. Most of the ethanol is producted from the cellule which the cows do not eat. So the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock. The second reason from the author which the ethanol can make some source of food for animals disappear is not reasonable.
Finally, the author holds the view that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government and if the government stops reducing the tax of the producer of the ethanol, its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that although the government supports ethanol, it always needs to do that. And it is predicted that the production of the ethanol will increase as 3 times as today. And ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 16, 2019 at 9:16 pmTPO 22 Integrated Writing
Score: 69.9
The author lists 3 [ informal writing/three] reasons that [incorrect word ] ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them are [ grammatical error] reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide just like gasoline [ unclear/burning gasoline]. But the professor states that the ethanol is made from the [article error ]plant. And [coordinating word error ]the plant can absorb carbon dioxide themselves [ grammatical error]which reduce the carbon dioxide. So the first reason can [ wrong word] be wrong.
Secondly, the professor challenges that the plant which is used to produce the ethanol is not the farm animals’ food. [ very difficult to unserstand] Most of the ethanol is producted [spelling error ]from the cellule which the cows do not eat. So [coordinating word error ] the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock. The second reason from the author which the ethanol can make some source of food for animals disappear is not reasonable [very difficult to understand ].
Finally, the author holds the view [redundant ]that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government [punctuation error ]and if the government stops reducing the tax of the producer of the ethanol [ redundant], its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that although the government supports ethanol [unclear/ethanol production? ], it always needs to do that [too many pronouns/unclear ]. And [ Coordinating word error] it is predicted that the production of the ethanol will increase as 3 [ informal]times as [ not parallel ]today. And [coordinating word ] ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 17, 2019 at 3:03 amThe author lists three reasons the argue that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them is reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide just like burning gasoline. However, the professor state that although burning ethanol can release carbon dioxide, growing plant can absorb carbon dioxide. So the first reason is wrong.
Secondly, the author asserts that ethanol can make some sources of food for animals disappear. But the professor challenges that producing ethanol will not reduce the food for the livestock. Most of the ethanol can be produced from the cellule which the cows do not eat. And the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock.
Finally, the author believes that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government. If the government stops reducing the tax, its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that the government’s supports for ethanol producers can increase production. Besides, it is predicted that the production of ethanol will increase three times today. Ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 18, 2019 at 2:04 amScore: 63.6
I will send you screenshots to illustrate problems/errors concerning your essay.
October 18, 2019 at 9:01 amThe author lists three reasons they argue that ethanol fuel is not a suitable replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them is reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide, just like other gasoline fuels. However, the professor states that although burning ethanol can release carbon dioxide, the growing plant can absorb carbon dioxide. So the first reason is wrong.
Secondly, the author asserts that ethanol can make some sources of food for animals disappear. But the professor challenges that producing ethanol will not reduce the forage for the livestock. We can produce ethanol by cellule, which livestock does not eat. And the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock.
Finally, the author believes that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government. If the government stops reducing the tax, its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that the government’s supports for ethanol producers can increase production. Besides, the production of ethanol will increase three times today. Ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 23, 2019 at 3:44 pmEthanol fuel is not a suitable replacement for gasoline.
Score: 60.8
The author lists three reasons
they argueexplaining that ethanol fuel is not a suitable replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them is reasonable.Firstly, the author
points outraises the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide,just like other gasoline fuels can. However, the professor also states that although burning ethanol can release carbon dioxide, the growing plant can absorb carbon dioxide. So the first reason is wrong.Secondly, the author asserts that ethanol
can[subjunctive voice ]make some sources of food for animals disappear [ unclear ]. But the professor challenges the argument that producing ethanol will not reduce the forage for the livestock. We [problematic person/unclear ] can produce ethanol by cellule, which livestock does not eat.And[Punctuation error/coordinating word ] Additionally, the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock.Finally, the author believes that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government. If the government stops reducing the tax, its price will increase above the gasoline.
However,On the other hand, the professor also points out that the government’s supports for ethanol producers can increase the production of what?. Besides, the production of ethanol will increase three times today. Ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
