Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. GRE Writing Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people.

  • Ceb_lvy
    University: University of Nottingham Ningbo China
    Nationality: 中国
    July 15, 2022 at 1:24 am

    Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a “Palean” basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

    Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

    Because Paleans could have crossed the Brim River only by boat to get to another ancient village, Lithos, one may claim that the presence of Palean baskets discovered in Lithos indicated that Palean baskets were not uniquely palean. However, there are many evidence needed to support or weeken this claim.

    The first evidence is that there was other ways for palean people to get to the Lithos, which weakens the claim above. Although there was Brim river that seemed blocked the communication between two ancient villiage, there was still many alternative way. For example, there was a bridge many miles away the village of Palea along the river where it was shallow and narrow, which even made swimming possible for human to get to the other side of the river.

    The second evidence is that boats could not be preserved for such a long time, which weakens the argument. There might be boats built but due to erosion or unexpected fire, they were destroyed, which made it hard for archaeologists to prove the existance of boats.

    The third evidence is that trade was infrequent at that time, which strengthens the argument. If the trade was not a available way, then there would be less possible for Lithos to obtain woven brakets through trade. Palean might sold woven brakets to others, and then these buyers sold the woven brakets to the people in in Lithos. In this way, buyers becomes a carrier for the propogation of woven brakets.

    July 16, 2022 at 4:13 am

    Please fix the errors indicated in the screen shot reviews.

    Ceb_lvy
    University: University of Nottingham Ningbo China
    Nationality: 中国
    July 16, 2022 at 12:04 pm

    Fix and resubmit:

    Because Paleans could have crossed the Brim River only by boat to get to another ancient village, Lithos, one may claim that the presence of Palean baskets discovered in Lithos indicated that Palean baskets were not uniquely palean. However, there is much evidence needed to support or weaken this claim.

    The first evidence is that there were other ways for palean people to get to the Lithos, which weakens the claim above. Although there was Brim river seemed to block the communication between two ancient villages, there were still many alternative ways. For example, there was a bridge many miles away from the village of Palea along the river which was shallow and narrow, which even made swimming possible for a human to get to the other side of the river.

    The second evidence is that boats could not be preserved for such a long time, which weakens the argument. There might be boats built but due to erosion or unexpected fire, they were destroyed, which made it hard for archaeologists to prove the existence of boats.

    The third piece of evidence is that trade was infrequent at that time, which strengthens the argument. If the trade was not an available way, then there would be less possible for Lithos to obtain woven brackets through trade. Palean might sell woven brackets to others, and then these buyers sold the woven brackets to the people in Lithos. In this way, buyers become a carrier for the propagation of woven brackets.

    July 19, 2022 at 2:24 pm

    Because Paleans could have crossed the Brim River only by boat to get to another ancient village, Lithos, one may claim that the presence of Palean baskets discovered in Lithos indicated that Palean baskets were not uniquely palean. However, there is much evidence needed to support or weaken this claim.

    The first evidence is that there were other ways for palean people to get to the Lithos, which weakens the claim above. Although there was Brim river seemed to block the communication between two ancient villages, there were still many alternative ways. For example, there was a bridge many miles away from the village of Palea along the river which was shallow and narrow, which even made swimming possible for a human to get to the other side of the river.

    The second evidence is that boats could not be preserved for such a long time, which weakens the argument. There might be boats built but due to erosion or unexpected fire, they were destroyed, which made it hard for archaeologists to prove the existence of boats.

    The third piece of evidence is that trade was infrequent at that time, which strengthens the argument. If the trade was not an available way, then there would be less possible for Lithos to obtain woven brackets through trade. Palean might sell woven brackets to others, and then these buyers sold the woven brackets to the people in Lithos. In this way, buyers become a carrier for the propagation of woven brackets.

    July 19, 2022 at 3:10 pm

    Fix the issues indicated in the screenshot reviews.

    Ceb_lvy
    University: University of Nottingham Ningbo China
    Nationality: 中国
    July 19, 2022 at 3:19 pm

    Because Paleans could have crossed the Brim River only by boat to reach another ancient village, Lithos, one may claim that the presence of Palean baskets discovered in Lithos indicated that Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. However, there is much evidence needed to support or weaken this claim.

    The first evidence is that there were other ways for Palean people to get to the Lithos, which weakens the claim above. Although there was Brim river seemed to block the communication between two ancient villages, there were still many alternative ways. For example, there was a bridge many miles away from the village of Palea along the river that was shallow and narrow, which even made swimming possible for a human to get to the other side of the river.

    The second evidence is that boats could not be preserved for a long time, which weakens the argument. There could have been boats built but due to erosion or unexpected fire, they were destroyed, which made it hard for archaeologists to prove the existence of the boats.

    The third piece of evidence is that trade was infrequent at that time, which strengthens the argument. If the trade then had not been not an available way, then there would be impossible for Lithos to obtain woven brackets via trade. Palean might sell woven brackets to others, and then these buyers sold the woven brackets to the people in Lithos. In this way, buyers become a carrier for the propagation of woven brackets.

    July 25, 2022 at 2:29 am

    Because Paleans could have crossed the Brim River only by boat to reach another ancient village, Lithos, one may claim that the presence of Palean baskets discovered in Lithos indicated that Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. However, there is much evidence needed to support or weaken this claim.

    The first evidence is that there were other ways for Palean people to get to the Lithos, which weakens the claim above. Although there was Brim river seemed to block the communication between two ancient villages, there were still many alternative ways. For example, there was a bridge many miles away from the village of Palea along the river that was shallow and narrow, which even made swimming possible for a human to get to the other side of the river.

    The second evidence is that boats could not be preserved for a long time, which weakens the argument. There could have been boats built but due to erosion or unexpected fire, they were destroyed, which made it hard for archaeologists to prove the existence of the boats.

    The third piece of evidence is that trade was infrequent at that time, which strengthens the argument. If the trade then had not been not an available way, then there would be impossible for Lithos to obtain woven brackets via trade. Palean might sell woven brackets to others, and then these buyers sold the woven brackets to the people in Lithos. In this way, buyers become a carrier for the propagation of woven brackets.

    July 25, 2022 at 2:30 am

    Fix the errors indicated in the screenshot reviews and then resubmit.

Tagged: