Cassie1990
TruckersForMe Participant TruckersForMe Participant

Your Replies

  • Cassie1990
    University: Ji Lin University
    Nationality: Chinese
    July 3, 2019 at 8:39 am

    Due to rapid urbanization, transportation is closely related to people’s daily life. In order to build  convenient transportation systems, many think that it is necessary for the government to construct numerous high-speed rails. Fast trains can enhance commuters’ travel efficiency and enhance connections between cities. However, others think improving current public transportation is more important since it can serve more local citizens.

    On the one hand, it is reasonable for the government to put emphasis on building fast trains between cities. Nowadays, people live further away from city centres because of the low cost of accommodation and daily expenses. Therefore, compared to private cars, the fast trains between cities can help dwellers save a large amount of time on the road. In addition, commuters also do not need to worry about traffic jams and car accidents. If they drive on the highway to travel to another city, they need to fully concentrate on their driving speed,wait for traffic lights and prevent traffic accidents.

    On the other hand, some people argue that constructing high- speed trains does not have short-term outcomes. Fast trains are expensive and not beneficial for large scale of citizens. Therefore, the government should put more efforts and revenue into the improvement of current public transportation. For instance, the government can add more public transportation routes spawning to suburb areas in the cities. It can also manage to build pleasant and comfortable environment for passengers. As a result, it is a practical way to encourage more people to take public transportation. The fewer number of private cars, the less toxic and harmful emissions will be.

    In conclusion, I think in the metropolis, the government should spend equal investment on the fast rails and public transportation. However, it is also reasonable for the authorities to invest more money on existing public transportation, especially in small cities.

    Cassie1990
    University: Ji Lin University
    Nationality: Chinese
    July 3, 2019 at 8:38 am

    Due to rapid urbanization, transportation is closely related to people’s daily life. In order to build  convenient transportation systems, many think that it is necessary for the government to construct numerous high-speed rails. Fast trains can enhance commuters’ travel efficiency and enhance connections between cities. However, others think improving current public transportation is more important since it can serve more local citizens.

    On the one hand, it is reasonable for the government to put emphasis on building fast trains between cities. Nowadays, people live further away from city centres because of the low cost of accommodation and daily expenses. Therefore, compared to private cars, the fast trains between cities can help dwellers save a large amount of time on the road. In addition, commuters also do not need to worry about traffic jams and car accidents. If they drive on the highway to travel to another city, they do not need to fully concentrate on their driving speed and wait for traffic lights.

    On the other hand, some people argue that constructing high- speed trains does not have short-term outcomes. Fast trains are expensive and not beneficial for large scale of citizens. Therefore, the government should put more efforts and revenue into the improvement of current public transportation. For instance, the government can add more public transportation routes spawning to suburb areas in the cities. It can also manage to build pleasant and comfortable environment for passengers. As a result, it is a practical way to encourage more people to take public transportation. The fewer number of private cars, the less toxic and harmful emissions will be.

    In conclusion, I think in the metropolis, the government should spend equal investment on the fast rails and public transportation. However, it is also reasonable for the authorities to invest more money on existing public transportation, especially in small cities.

    Cassie1990
    University: Ji Lin University
    Nationality: Chinese
    June 28, 2019 at 1:20 am

    Due to rapid urbanization, transportation has closely related to people’s daily life. Many think that it is necessary for the government to construct more high-speed rails. They can improve commuters’ travel efficiency and enhance connections between cities. However, others think that current public transportation can serve more local citizens.

    On the one hand, it is reasonable for the government to emphasize on building fast trains between cities. Nowadays, people live further away from city centers because of the low cost of accommodation and daily expenses. Therefore, compared to private cars, the fast trains between cities can help dwellers save a large amount of time on the road. In addition, commuters also do not need to worry about traffic jams and car accidents.If they drive on the highway to travel to another city, they need to concentrate on driving speed, traffic light and prevent other cars from causing traffic problems.

    On the other hand, some people argue that constructing high- speed trains is not a short-term profit. It is expensive and not beneficial for a large scale of citizens. Therefore, it is better for the government to put more efforts and revenue into the improvement of current public transportation. For instance, the government can add more public transportation routes spawning to suburb areas in the cities. It can also improve the locomotive management and environment of metro or bus stations. As a result, it is an practical way to encourage more people to take public transportation. This is a flow-on effect, since the fewer number of private cars, the less toxic and harmful emissions will be.

    In conclusion, I think in the metropolis, the government should spend equal investment on the fast rails and public transportation. However, it is reasonable for the authorities to invest more money on existing public transportation. Public transport is the main issue that affects more citizens because it serves more people.

    Cassie1990
    University: Ji Lin University
    Nationality: Chinese
    June 28, 2019 at 1:19 am

    The charts illustrate the comparisons between different destinations of UK graduates and undergraduates after they leave school.

    According to the first graph, the majority of students sought further study (29665). However, the smallest number of them, roughly 3500 students, doing voluntary work. In addition, the quantity of graduates who chose to work as part-time employees and did not locate for a job was almost the same.

    Similarly, it can be noticed that the largest number of students choosing further study at 2725, which was followed by 2535 youngsters, locating part-time occupations.The quantity of unemployment students was slightly smaller than part-time job students. The year of 2008 also witnessed the smallest number of UK postgraduates to be volunteers.

    In conclusion, the number of graduates was ten times larger than the number of postgraduate students. Among the four components of the graduation destinations, further study was the most popular choice for them. There were roughly the same quantity of graduate and postgraduate choosing the part-time jobs or without entering the work forces.Furthermore,voluntary work was the least attractive choice for UK students.