Nowadays, it is controversial whether the government should spend much more money on art field than athletics field. While some would argue the support of athletics could do many benefits, it is better if government spends much more money on the arts.

To begin with, those who believe that government needs pay more money to athletics would argue that this support could make citizens live a healthier life. The government could spend the money on the construction of stadiums and the investigation of sophisticated ways about exercise. This improvement would lead some residents to have a better environment to keep healthy.

However, while the improvement of the sports field could make a benefit to people’s health, this can only contribute to a specific part of people who are willing to do exercise. The financial support of arts could improve the aesthetic level. The money devoted to art education in school could help students learn more history, the forms, and the meanings of art. As a result, it could generally improve people’s understanding of many artworks. For example, nowadays, few people would deny the greatness of Shakespear’s plays, because the improvement of aesthetic level makes most people understand the meaning of his masterpieces and appreciate the sophisticated plots.

Additionally, the financial support of arts could improve the science and technology world. The promotion of art makes it is easier for people to invent. The essence of art is creating, since all the paintings, sculptures, and staff like that always need the artists to imagine. For example, the painters always need to imagine the structure, the combination of colors, and the theme. This imagination could effectively improve people’s ability to create, which is critical for people to come up with precedented ideas. Take the climate system as an example. It is the creation of earth scientists and physicists in 1950s that caused them have been attempting to model the earth climate on computers. Finally, we have the complex climate system we use today to predict the future climate change.