When we think about a big company, we may think about a place of wealth, which include large amounts of employees who are efficient and proficient. However,  it is not too much of a stretch to say that these investments are too fly in the face of their initial anticipation, within the reasons below， from my perspective.

It is not too much to say that improving employee’s efficiency and proficiency does have its merit. For a small company, an efficient employee can not only at play when he comes into a difficult official problem, such as a mistake in the computer program, but also induce the whole company, thus push the whole company to come into effect to increase productivity. However, benefits to the small company cannot be said on a large corporate. Large corporate involves a complicated business system that a small company could not achieve. For example, the technical giant, Apple, manages thousands of employees and several sub-companies. Apple regards its company as a web-like system. Everyone owns their place, but would not hurt any other interests.

Second, improving employees’ efficiency and proficiency might cause negative influence when employees lose sustenance. A mature worker who possesses a proficient skill is rare. At that time, people who become more mature will retire for a higher salary. Thus, the employee’s training can turn out to be a serious financial burden. Companies have only cost for the train but without any feedback when the training program is getting finish. It is definitely a great loss no matter whether the company is big or not. To improve the investments for a big company may not be the first choice.

Besides, the investments in big companies can be huge when it had to do with marketing. Companies need to compete with each other by invest in many things, such as letter stocks or futures. Training employees are too much difficult than investment. The manager can sit in their office to do investment and watch other companies to bring interests for the manager’s own company.