littlecobber
TruckersForMe Participant TruckersForMe Participant

Your Replies

  • littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    October 24, 2020 at 2:23 am

    If only I saw your essays a little bit earlier, I would have done better in my writing test…At least more than 22 🙂

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    October 14, 2020 at 5:34 am

    With the remarkable development of technology, people’s enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe show an upward trend in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

    First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could make a tangible contribution to society. For example, if the government invests more in infrastructures conducive to social welfare, such as sanctuary and free educational institution, more citizens can benefit from it. Homeless people can find a place to keep warm and spare themselves from starvation. Poor students can afford education without debts’ pressure. In that case, people’s living standards get improved, and the crime rate drops, which ensures social stability and prosperity. Hence, cutting down the expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

    What is more, many thorny problems remain to be solved in this world. Those issues are priorities for governments worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as the melting of icebergs and the increase in sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies fail to tackle that problem effectively. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, bad effects will exacerbate the global problem. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

    In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce space exploration costs, create further social welfare, and focus on existing problems.

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    October 13, 2020 at 1:39 am

    With the remarkable development of technology, people’s enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe are rising in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

    First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could be used to make a tangible contribution to society. If the government invests more in infrastructures conducive to the growth of the economy, more dwellers can benefit from the infrastructures that can generate considerable employment. In that case, people’s living standards get improved and crime rate declines, which ensures nation’s stability. Hence, cutting down the expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

    What is more, there are still thorny and costly problems that remain to be solved in this world. Those issues should be the priority for governments worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as the melting of icebergs and the increase in sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies fail to effectively tackle that problem. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, bad effects will exacerbate the global problem. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

    In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce space exploration costs, create further social welfare, and focus on existing problems.

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    October 11, 2020 at 3:18 am

    With the remarkable development of technology, the enthusiasm and curiosity to explore the universe are increasing in current society. However, some voices arouse that it is, to some extent, a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. From my perspective, this opinion is convincing and warranted. The details are as follows.

    First, spending excessive money on space travel and exploration is not worthy. Because those financial investments could have been used to make a tangible contribution to society. Provided that the government invest more on infrastructures that are conducive to the growth of economy, more dwellers can benefit from the infrastructures that can generate considerable employment. In that case, people’s living standards get improved and criminal rate declines, which ensure the stability of a nation. Hence, cutting down expense of space exploration to create more social welfare is of great essence to the government.

    What is more, there are still thorny and costly problems that remain to be solved in this world. Those issues should be the first priority for government worldwide to consider. For instance, global warming continues and has double-side effects on almost every region. It may lead to severe consequences such as melting of icebergs and increase of sea level. Nevertheless, current strategies can not effectively tackle that problem. If governments do not pay enough attention to that; and spend a great deal of money on less urgent events, the environment will keep deteriorating. Therefore, governments must put more energy and money on emergency.

    In conclusion, I contend that the government should reduce the cost for space exploration, create further social welfare and focus on existing problems.

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    June 18, 2020 at 2:46 pm

    It is not uncommon to see roads filled with vehicles in modern society since cars have been playing a vital role in our daily commute. In that case, some people anticipate that the number of cars will decline in the next two decades. In my perspective, however, the demand for vehicles will keep increasing regardless of other possible influences.

    To begin with, technology has developed at a fast pace, making the upgrading of car industry feasible. That means traditional cars will probably be replaced by new energy cars in the near future. Thus, lacking fossil fuels and gases can not result in the decrease of output of vehicles. For instance, Tesla is the leader of new energy vehicles, which substitutes petroleum for electricity. So, storage of conventional fuels can not confine the mass production of new energy cars, which suggests that the total amount of vehicles will not reduce, it’s just that the ratio of traditional cars to new energy vehicles changes.

    Additionally, opponents who are against my point of view consider that many people nowadays are suffering from financial problems. They argue that it is more and more difficult to get a car since people’s money has been used to pay back debts. But fortunately, the government has made a statement on cutting down price of new energy cars in recent years. In order to advocate the use of renewable sources, governments published many policies, including providing special allowances for citizens.

    Last but not least, there is an increasing demand for vehicles among young generations. Old vehicles can not satisfy their special taste. Young generations are looking for something which contains unique and fashionable elements. High-tech cars are just in line with the requirements. Admittedly, public transportation is becoming more convenient and effective than ever, which seems that there is no need for a private car. But in big cities, public transportation can often be crowded. People have to experience discomfort in relatively narrow space.

    In summary, people’s enthusiasm about purchasing cars will by no means fade away in the future.

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    June 18, 2020 at 2:46 am

    The statement above has given rise to a dramatic dispute. People’s opinions varied from person to person. Some people say that it takes about two decade to see a reduction in the number of cars. However their thoughts suffer from both logical and factual fallacies.

    Firstly, with the development of societies, a upgrading of automobile industrial structure is undergoing.
    That means traditional cars will probably supplanted by new energy cars in the near future. Lacking fossil fuels and gases is no more a negative influence for vehicle production. For example, Tesla is the pioneer of new energy vehicles, using electricity to substitute petroleum. This can even enlarge the longevity of vehicles. So, the totally amount of vehicles will not decrease, it’s just that the ratio of conventional cars to new energy vehicles will change.

    Most opponents of my perspective hold view of that economic issues can also in favor of their argument.
    They consider that it is more and more difficult to get a lucrative job nowadays. People are less likely to afford a car under the pressure of mortgage. Nevertheless, the government has made a statement on cutting down price of new energy cars in recent years. They encourage us to use renewable sources. Other
    policies also have been established to help citizens to afford a car, such as providing an allowance for them.

    Last but not least, there is an increasing demands for vehicles among young generations. Old vehicles can not satisfy their discerning taste, which causes their pursuits of fashionable cars. Admittedly, public transportation is becoming more convenient and effective than ever. People will still try to buy vehicles, considering that an expensive car can illustrate their uncommon status.

    To summary, people’s enthusiasm about buying cars will by no means fade away. Although changes of the world are hard to anticipate, the whole picture can still be foreseed. And time can prove all of this.

    littlecobber
    University: YZU
    Nationality: China
    June 17, 2020 at 1:56 am

    There have been a fierce debate among the given statement. Some of people say that it only takes about twenty years to see the decline of the cars in use. Others hold the contrary opinion. In my perspective, however, i agree with the former agrument.

    To begin with, due to the rapid development of Internet, information disseminates in a fast pace.
    Because of this,everyone has easy access to learn the advanced technology of producing vehicles.
    In that case, increasing production of cars will lead to market saturation. So vehicle industry is losing its competition and status in this world, which can cut down the profits they earn. Eventually, the car production in decades will decrease in a dramatic way.

    What’s more, mass production of vehicles can cause serious environmental problems. Air pollution
    and water waste take the dominant place among the problems. Carbon dioxide is the main gas which result in the global warming. As cars running on the road, it emits a plenty of carbon dioxide along with sulfur dioxide. Factories sprang up in the past few years. To avoid paying expensive fee of proceeding water, they just pull wasted water directly into the nearby river, which cause the damage of bio-diversity of fish kinds.

    Finally, the storage of oil and gas are running out. People haven’t found the best alternative fuel for vehicles’ motivation. The fuel we use nowadays consists of fossil fuel in the large proportion. Fossil fuel needs a long period of time to form, thus, demand for fuel will exceed supply in the future. It can’t be denied that governments encourage enormous investment in nuclear or new energy vehicle. But there still remaining a lot of factors to be taken into account, such as charge station and recycling problems.

    In summary, the tendency of the decrease of vehicles will not change in the next decades.