ULALA
TruckersForMe Participant TruckersForMe Participant

Your Replies

  • ULALA
    University: Southwest University
    Nationality: China
    October 1, 2020 at 1:48 am

    In a highly developed society, it is hard to imagine there is no Internet around. On account of its necessity, whether the Internet should charge becomes a vital topic. In my opinion, governments shouldn’t provide Internet access to all citizens for free.

    First, Internet has the power to make profits. The internet companies can create billions of dollars through providing access, which is a crucial constituent part of global economy. To be more specific, Internet companies provide loads of job opportunities and accelerate capital flow. If government controls the access of Internet, lots of people would lose their job and slowdown the economical development. Rather than public service, Internet serves as a product, which has greater potential to our society. Therefore, it should not be controlled by the government.

    Equally important, non-public service system introduces competitiveness. Plenty of Internet companies contribute to the prosperity of information age today. For example, if only one restaurant within a town, by no means would it manage to attract customers. While the situation would be different if there were more restaurants. Once being aware of competition, restaurants can strive to promote themselves. It is more or less the same as the Internet. If the government selects a company, the situation would be unimaginable.

    Admittedly, more people can be available to Internet if goverment offers access. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, cost of Internet has dropped sharply. Now people can easily surf the Internet with spending very little money . For instance, a decade ago, 3G Internet, which was hard to afford years ago, already had a very low price today.

    A concise conclusion, through illustration and examples, can be drawn that governments should not offer Internet access for free.

    ULALA
    University: Southwest University
    Nationality: China
    September 29, 2020 at 1:55 am

    In a highly developed society, it is hard to imagine there is no Internet around. On account of its necessity, whether the Internet should charge becomes a vital topic. In my opinion, governments shouldn’t provide Internet access to all citizen for free.

    First, one important property of Internet serves as profitability. The internet can create billions of dollars, which is an crucial part of global economy. To be more specific, Internet companies provide loads of job opportunities and also accelerate capital flow. If government control the access of Internet, lot of people will lose job and maybe the economy will slowdown. Rather than a public service, Internet has greater potential to our society, therefore should not be controlled by the government.

    Equally important, non-public service system introduce competitiveness. It is plenty of Internet companies that engender the prosperity of information age today. For example, if only one restaurant in a school, by no means would it dig for new meals. While the situation would be different if there are more restaurants. Once being aware of competition, they can strive to promote themselves. This is more or less the same as the Internet. If the government appoints a company, the situation will be unimaginable, at least Internet speed .

    Admittedly, more people can use Internet if charging no fee. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, the cost of Internet has dropped sharply. Now people can easily surf the Internet with even less than a meal. For instance, a decade ago, 3G Internet was difficult to afford, while 5G began to occupy people’s life today, and 3G has already had a very low price.

    A concise conclusion, through above illustration and examples, can be drawn that governments should not offer Internet access for free.

    ULALA
    University: Southwest University
    Nationality: China
    September 18, 2020 at 12:27 pm

    In a highly developed society, it is hard to imagine there is no Internet around. Nevertheless, whether the Internet should charge has become a controversial topic owing to the universality and the supporting role of social operation. In my opinion, governments should not offer Internet access to all the citizen at no cost.

    First, one imperative property of Internet serves as profitability. In just one day, the internet can create billions of benefits, which is a vital constitution of the global economy. To be more specific, the Internet providers are usually private companies. For them, the Internet is not only a technology to be improved, but also a merchandise to earn money. With profit as an incentive, these companies will continue to upgrade their products, and eventually affect people’s lives. Rather than public services, such as roads, the Internet has greater potential and profitability, therefore should not be controlled by the government.

    Equally important, non-public service system introduce competitiveness. It is plenty of Internet providers that engender a trend of better service. For example, if only one restaurant in a community, by no means would it have tasty meals and proper price. Once being aware of competition, they can strive to promote themselves. This is more or less the same as the Internet. Without competition, the government appoints a company, the situation will be unimaginable, at least Internet speed .

    Admittedly, there will be more citizens accessible to Internet if charging no fee. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, the cost of Internet has dropped sharply. Now people can easily surf the Internet without spending much money. For instance, a decade ago, 3G Internet was difficult to afford, while 5G began to occupy people’s life today, and 3G has already had a very low price.

    A concise conclusion, through above illustration and examples, can be drawn that governments should not offer Internet access for free.

    ULALA
    University: Southwest University
    Nationality: China
    September 17, 2020 at 6:14 am

    In a highly developed society, it is hard to imagine there is no Internet around, function as bridge to link us with each other and the world. Nevertheless, whether the Internet should charge has become a controversial topic owing to the universality and the supporting role of social operation. In my opinion, governments should not offer Internet access to all the citizen at no cost.

    First, one imperative property of Internet serves as profitability. In just one day, the internet can create billions of benefits on a global scale, which is a vital constitution of the global economy. To be more specific, the Internet providers are usually private companies or organizations. For them, the Internet is not only a way to improve our living standard, but also a merchandise that make lots of money. With profit as an incentive, these companies will continue to upgrade their products, give rise to advanced technology and affect people’s life eventually. Rather than public services, such as roads, the Internet with greater potential and profitability is not the basis of social life, therefore should not be controlled by the government.

    Equally important, non-public service system introduce competitiveness. It is plenty of Internet providers that engender a trend of better service. Take a simple example, if there is only one restaurant in a community, by no means would it have tasty meals and proper price. Once being aware of there is more than one restaurant with good reputation, they can strive to promote themselves, which is more or less the same as the Internet. Had it not been for experiencing competitiveness, the government selects a company to offer people with the Internet, the situation will be unimaginable, at least Internet speed .

    Admittedly, there will be more citizens accessible to Internet if charging no fee. However, with the rapid development of science and technology, the cost of Internet has dropped sharply. Now people can easily surf the Internet without spending much money. A decade ago, 3G Internet was difficult to afford, while 5G began to occupy people’s life today, and 3G has already had a very low price.

    A concise conclusion, through above illustration and examples, can be drawn that governments should not offer Internet access for free.