xhjxczx
Your Replies
-
October 18, 2019 at 9:01 am
The author lists three reasons they argue that ethanol fuel is not a suitable replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them is reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide, just like other gasoline fuels. However, the professor states that although burning ethanol can release carbon dioxide, the growing plant can absorb carbon dioxide. So the first reason is wrong.
Secondly, the author asserts that ethanol can make some sources of food for animals disappear. But the professor challenges that producing ethanol will not reduce the forage for the livestock. We can produce ethanol by cellule, which livestock does not eat. And the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock.
Finally, the author believes that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government. If the government stops reducing the tax, its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that the government’s supports for ethanol producers can increase production. Besides, the production of ethanol will increase three times today. Ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 18, 2019 at 8:52 amWith the developing of technology, teenager and kids spend more time using the cell phone. As they received more information than before from the Internet, they may think more than the children decades ago. Some parents state that it is more difficult for them to teach their kids. However, I hold the contrary view that it is easy to educate children. The reasons are as below:
Firstly, we can use the cell phone as a kid-education tool because the cell phone is a convenient tool. For example, in the past, we should give the kids some books to read, and it is difficult for us to find books and consider which one is suitable. But now we can search on google to find some reading material online and then send the link to the kids, which is a more effective way to educate children.
Secondly, the online social networking website may not be a bad thing for the kids because it can reduce their pressure. For instance, I saw some people working as a consultor for the kids. The kids can share their problems such as some arguments with friends or some unhappy things with them, and they give the kids advice. I think it truly makes many kids happy and benefit to their mental health. So I think such communication can keep the kids from negative emotions.
Although there is much harmful information on the website, it has more advantage than the disadvantage. What the parents should do is to keep their children from harmful information. Clear them the right things. Teach them how to distinguish the information. And harmful information will not be a problem.
As for the reasons showing above, it is not a difficult thing to educate a child who likes to play cell phone. If the parents can choose the right way to guide children, spending time on the electric device will not be a problem.
October 17, 2019 at 3:03 amThe author lists three reasons the argue that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor believes that none of them is reasonable.
Firstly, the author points out the fact that burning ethanol can produce carbon dioxide just like burning gasoline. However, the professor state that although burning ethanol can release carbon dioxide, growing plant can absorb carbon dioxide. So the first reason is wrong.
Secondly, the author asserts that ethanol can make some sources of food for animals disappear. But the professor challenges that producing ethanol will not reduce the food for the livestock. Most of the ethanol can be produced from the cellule which the cows do not eat. And the ethanol does not reduce the available plant for the livestock.
Finally, the author believes that the price of ethanol can be a problem for the government. If the government stops reducing the tax, its price will increase above the gasoline. However, the professor points out that the government’s supports for ethanol producers can increase production. Besides, it is predicted that the production of ethanol will increase three times today. Ethanol’s price will reduce by 40 percent at the same time.
October 17, 2019 at 2:41 amWith the developing of technology, teenager and kids spend more time using cell phone. As they received more information than before from the Internet, they may think more than the children decades ago. Some parents think that it is more difficult for them to teach their kids. However, I hold the contrary view that it is easy to educate children. The reasons are as below:
Firstly, we can use the cell phone as a kid-education tool because the cell phone is an effective tool. For example, in the past, we should give the kids some books to read and it is difficult for us to find books and consider which one is suitable. But now we can just search on google to find some reading material online and then send the link to the kids which is a more effective way to educate children.
Secondly, the online social networking website may not be a bad thing for the kids because it can reduce their pressure. For instance, I saw some people working as a consultor for the kids. The kids can share their problems such as some arguments with friends or some unhappy things with them and they give the kids advise. I think it truly makes many kids happy and good for their mental health. So I think such communication can keep the kids from bad emotions.
Although there are much bad information on the website, it has more advantage than the disadvantage. What the parents should do is to keep their children from the bad website. And telling them what is right. Teach them how to distinguish the information. And the bad website will not be a problem.
As the reasons showing above, educating children is not a difficult mission. If the parents can choose the right way to educate children, spending time on the electric device will not be a problem.
