Nowadays, the technology of information transfer has developed more rapidly than before. Without going outside, people can know the things that happened in the world. It is hard to tell whether individuals will benefit from the sharing of information. Some people think it is crucial to let everyone hear academic and technological ideas from the world. In contrast, I think governments have to control and share the right and valuable pieces of messages to citizens.
It is undeniable that sharing information among people has many advantages. Knowing the business information will benefit consumers. For example, customers won’t buy a broken car in the car market. One reason for that is people already knew which supplier is trustworthy. What’s more, sharing information on scientific research may benefit citizens. Some basic knowledge like how to do first-aid can help people when they are in danger. Also, publish information about new laws freely can let the government hear mixed voices. Various comments allow policymakers to understand what residents need.
On the other hand, sharing information may harm some people’s profit. Firms are reluctant to share their innovative ideas since most industries want to improve their competitiveness. A typical example is Coca Cola that kept its recipe as a secret for many years to enhance brand loyalty. Moreover, reading academic messages may mean a waste of time for many people. In other words, professional information may be meaningless for many individuals. For example, artists may never use advanced medical skills in their lives. Besides, companies share information among them may harm customers’ rights. A cartel will appear if companies communicate to set an extremely high price for essential goods.
To sum up, individuals need to distinguish between valuable and valueless information. Sometimes the free exposure of information may let many people suffer.

Nowadays, the technology of information transfer has developed much rapidly than before. People know everything that happened in the day without going outside. It is hard to tell whether individuals will benefit from the sharing of information. Some people think it is crucial to let everyone heard academic and technological ideas worldwide. In contrast, I think governments have to judge to share the right pieces of messages to citizens.

It is undeniable that sharing information among people has many advantages. Knowing the business information will make trades more transparent. For example, customers won’t buy a low-quality car in the second-car market. One reason for that is people already knew which supplier is trustworthy. What’s more, sharing information on scientific research may benefit public citizens. Some basic knowledge like how to do first-aid can help people when they are in danger. Also, governments can always hear mixed voices when they publish information about new laws. Various comments allow policymakers to understand what residents need.

On the other hand, sharing information may harm some people’s profit. Firms are reluctant to share their innovative ideas since most industries want to improve their competitiveness. A typical example is coco-cola that keeps its recipe as a secret for many years to enhance brand loyalty. Moreover, academic messages are not valuable for everybody. For example, artists may never use advanced medical skills in their lives. In other words, professional information may be meaningless for many individuals. Besides, companies share information among them may harm customers’ rights. A cartel will appear if companies communicate to set an extremely high price for essential goods.

To sum up, individuals need to distinguish between valuable and valueless information. Sometimes the exposure of information may let many people suffer.

Indeed, individuals always face many difficulties in their lives, especially when they settle in a foreign-language country. However, I disagree that problems caused by lacking language skills are severe. Also, language abilities are possible to improve.

Being unfamiliar with foreign languages makes live abroad harder. First of all, cultural barriers are a common issue that non-native speakers meet. Different customs build up different language structures. For me, it is troublesome to understand jokes or puns in other languages.

Moreover, many learners only study academic vocabulary, not daily expression. As an economics student, I am more familiar with “hyperinflation” rather than “shaver. Also, migrants’ words may sound rude if people are not good at a language. For example, people may not know how to say “please” or other words that sound politely.

However, these difficulties won’t lead to horrible issues. Individuals can always develop their language skills in daily life. People will mimic others instinctively, which means that it is not hard to learn how others speak. What’s more, individuals can overcome these difficulties by persisting in studying. Also, most native speakers will understand migrants’ situation and they will be kinder to them. As a Chinese, I will praise my friend when she speaks Chinese. That is not because she is good at it. The main thing is that she likes Chinese cultures. Moreover, she wants to learn about China.

From what I addressed above, I don’t think non-native speakers cannot beat these problems. The thing people should do is improving themselves.

It is undeniable that happiness may take an unignorable role in our life. Still, it is hard to give a specific definition of happiness which can meet the standard set by everybody. There are many essential requirements which you cannot be happy until you meet them.

Various reasons make happiness hard to define. Firstly, people may have different opinions if they have different types of jobs. For careers like teachers or firefighters, contribute to others make most of them feel fulfillment. In contrast, many entrepreneurs may see abundant wealth as pleasure. Secondly, different age groups define happiness in various ways. For example, elders are more likely to chase a stable, peaceful life, which is a big contrast with teenagers’ pursuits. Finally, as social animals who can be influenced by their surroundings, people fell content for different reasons if they got different living environments. For example, children who come from divorced families may fill fulfill if they build a complete family.

Three crucial principals make happiness touchable. The most critical factor is not to be puzzled by social standards when you pursue satisfaction. Learning about yourself and finding what you want is non-negligible. What’s more, always being diligent and persistent is necessary. Individuals need to make efforts during chasing happiness, they should understand the importance of never giving up. Also, people need to have a pair of good found eyes. It is crucial to know small happiness in daily life, like breakfast made by mom, is as valuable as big fortunes that changes your life.

In conclusion, there are numerable reasons that make happiness hard to define, but everyone has the chance to achieve happiness if they meet needed requests.

Contemporarily, the number of young adults takes a larger proportion of the population than elders. Whether this phenomenon is good or not has become a controversial question. In my opinion, it is a good situation.

A high number of young adults benefit domestic producers. What I mean by that is, many young people will join the domestic labor markets. This behavior offers companies more choices. What’s more, supply costs will decrease when producers choose cheaper labor. Compare with older people, young adults are more diligent. Besides, they are always more keen to follow global trends. For producers, these characteristics make young labors efficient and keep up with times.

A large number of young labors raises government budget surplus. In other words, the tax paid by youngsters increases government revenue. According to <financial times>, young people’s purchasing power is higher than elders. Because of this, they also had to pay higher sales taxes. Governments can use this revenue to benefit domestic citizens by improving public infrastructures.

On the other hand, the high number of young adults may worsen the domestic economic situation. The main reason is more young people are in debt compared to old people. When there is a limit supply, increasing demand for money may lead to a higher interest rate. This increase in interest rate makes saving profitable therefore discourages people’s willingness to buy. Fortunately, setting the maximum borrowing amount can restrain this behavior.

From what has been addressed before, the large number of young adults is good. It is because this situation has many advantages like profiting domestic producers and increasing government revenue. Although young people have higher debt probability than elders, this can be solved by government intervention.