Government should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. TOEFL Writing Government should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

  • Ying
    University: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Nationality: China
    September 3, 2020 at 3:50 pm

    Government should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

    With the development of society, art and athletics both play a significant role in our life. it is hard to judge which one, the arts or the athletics, is of greater importance. As for me, however, athletics wins the priority when comes to limited financial funding.

    For one thing, athletics is easier to get started compared to the arts. That is to say learning a athletic skill require less talent and competence, which mean that almost everyone can master a skill without too much difficulties. Nevertheless, when it comes to art learning, many basic skills are necessary to actually finish a work such as imagination, the choice of color, distribution and so on. These requirements raise the level for people to start an art creation and deter the majority from the very beginning of the learning process.

    For another, there is more competitive felling involved in an athletic game, which add more fun and meaning to the game itself. In other words, athletics enable us to distinguish the superior and inferior one while art doesn’t. For instance, during a running race, it is obvious for us to judge which one should win the first prize depending on the time the athletes spend. Instead, telling which oil painting is better is an almost impossible task.

    Moreover, funding athletics stimulate the people and arouse their passion to get involved in physics exercise. More money spent on the athletics means more gyms, swimming pool, which can increase the living standard and the happiness level of the residents. The more exercise infrastructures are built, and the healthier the people would be, which may save the government a lot of money that planned to spent on health insurance.

    From what have been discussed above we can draw a conclusion that though the arts and athletics are two totally different field, more money should be spent on  athletics.

    September 3, 2020 at 5:55 pm

    Score: ungraded

    Issues:

    1. About 65% of the sentences exceed 20 words. Shorten/split them.
    2. About 30% of the sentences are passive. Convert some of them into their active counterparts.

    I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.

    September 3, 2020 at 5:58 pm

    Please add my WeChat and remind me of sending you screenshot reviews.

    Ying
    University: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Nationality: China
    September 4, 2020 at 3:36 am

    With the development of society, art and athletics both play a significant role in our life. It is hard to judge which one, the arts or the athletics, is of greater importance. As for me, I believe athletics is worthier to invest.

    For one thing, athletics is easier to get started compared to the arts. Learning an athletic skill needs less talent and competence. Through basic training and practice, almost everyone can master an athletics skill without too many difficulties. However, we need more basic skills to finish art work such as the choice of color. It potentially raises the level for people to start an art creation and deter the majority from the beginning of the learning process.

    For another, athletic competition can be more competitive, which adds more fun and meaning to the game itself. In other words, athletics enable people to distinguish a better one and a worse one. For instance, it is rational for us to give the first prize to the fastest runner not the slowest one. Instead, telling which oil painting is better is an almost impossible task. Because a painting represents a thought, and there is no good and bad about a thought. Could we say that Monet’s water lily is better than Van Gogh’s sunflower? Absolutely no.

    Moreover, funding athletics arouse people’s passion to get involved in physical exercise. More money spent on the athletics means more gyms, swimming pool. These infrastructures can increase the living standard and the happiness level of the residents. The more exercise infrastructures are built, the more possibility for people to exercise and the healthier people would be. People would spend less money to maintain healthy, but more on other fields, stimulating the economy.

    From what has been discussed above, we can draw a conclusion that more money should be spent on the athletics.