Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? How to solve it?

Freshmen in companies are more likely to lack interpersonal skills. It seems that the recruitment mechanism and highly fierce competition need to be blamed.

For starters, social abilities could not be identified easily through the traditional type of interview. The one-to-one pattern concentrates more on the specialized knowledge rather than the social skills of appliances. Besides, some people might invent their experiences to cater for the demands of interviewers. While this action would help them leave a better impression, it would be hard for recruiters to understand their real abilities.

Furthermore, the sharp competition in the workplace would pose more individualism. An increasing number of qualified workers enter the workplace, which renders the promotion harder and harder. Thus when doing group work, freshmen would rather try to stand out instead of fitting into the whole team. Undeniably it one of the underlying reason why they find it difficult to collaberate with others.

To deal with the problem, I believe that businesses need to upgrade the interview pattern. Widely accepted, it is easier to perceive the all-round capacity of appliances during a group interview. This pattern simulates real working environment, where appliances should not only show their perspectives but also address disparate views of their partners. Their problem-solving and teamwork skills are able to be understood thoroughly through the reaction in front of disputes. Therefore, the group interview might be an optimum way to recruit appropriate employers.

To summarize, the recruitment system could be the culprit of this phenomenon. If the business could modify their interview pattern, then it would be better.

Freshmen in companies are more likely to lack interpersonal skills. I believe that the recruitment mechanism and fierce competition are the culprits.

For starters, employers cannot identify the social abilities easily through the traditional type of interview. The one-to-one pattern concentrates more on the specialized knowledge of appliances. Thus their teamwork skills cannot be judged directly. Besides, some people might invent their social experiences to meet the demands of interviewers. While this action would help them leave a better impression, recruiters would find it difficult to make the best decision.

Furthermore, the sharp competition in the workplace would pose more individualism. As an increasing number of qualified workers enter the workplace, the promotion has gotten harder and harder. Therefore, to get the opportunity for personal progression, when doing group work, freshmen would rather try to stand out instead of fitting into the whole team.

To deal with the problem, in my opinion, businesses should upgrade the interview pattern. For example, a group interview could be a better way to identify their abilities. Every participant would have a disparate view in front of the same question, which tends to trigger disputes during the interview. In this case, employers’ problem-solving skills and teamwork skills could be seen clearly when they tackle the opponent opinions. Besides, companies should build a cooperative working atmosphere. Experienced workers have the responsibility to cultivate freshmen, which could be tied with the salaries.

To summarize, the recruitment system could be the culprit of this phenomenon. If the business could revolutionize their interview pattern, then it would be better.

Freshmen in companies are more likely to lack interpersonal skills. I believe that the recruitment mechanism and fierce competition are the culprits.

For starters, the traditional type of interview cannot identify social abilities easily. The interview only involving two people concentrates more on the specialized knowledge of appliances. Besides, as social skills could only be seen by old experiences, some people might color their CVs using fake stories to cater for interviewers. While this behavior would help them leave a better impression, recruiters would find it difficult to make a decision.

Furthermore, sharp competition in the workplace would bring more individualism. As there are an increasing number of qualified workers, the promotion has gotten harder. To get the opportunity for personal progression, freshmen would rather try to stand out instead of being an excellent team player. This phenomenon tends to beget inevitable contradictions in the workplace.

To deal with the problem, businesses should upgrade the interview pattern. For example, a group interview can identify their teamwork abilities better. Every participant would have a disparate view facing the same question, so there would be unavoidable disputes during the interview. When employees tackle opponent opinions, their teamwork skills and problem-solving skills could emerge. Moreover, building a cooperative working atmosphere could reverse this situation as well. Experienced workers should cultivate freshmen, whose results tie with the salaries. As for newcomers, they should learn to fit into the whole team, otherwise, they are likely to face the sake.

To summarize, the recruitment system could be the culprit of this phenomenon. If the business could revolutionize their interview pattern, then it would be better.

Some companies perceive that newcomers would have a shortage of basic social skills.  I believe that the recruitment mechanism and fierce competition in the workplace are the culprits.

For starters,  de facto, traditional type of interview might not identify social abilities easily. The interview only involving two people concentrates more on the specialized knowledge of applicants instead of how they collaborate with others. Besides, as this kind of skills could only be seen by old working experiences in one-to-one interview, some people might beautify their CVs using fake stories to satisfy interviewers. While this behavior would help them leave a better impression, recruiters would find it difficult to make a decision.

Furthermore, sharp competition in the workplace would bring inevitable disputes. With an increasing number of qualified workers in companies, the promotion become harder than ever. To get the opportunity for personal progression, new employers would rather show off their working ability to stand out instead of becoming an excellent team player.

To mitigate the problem, businesses should upgrade interview protocols. For example, a panel interview could identify applicants’ teamwork abilities. Every participant is likely to have a disparate view facing a question, so disputes would be unavoidable during the interview. Tackling opponent opinions would be an optimun way to demonstrate teamwork skills and problem-solving skills. Moreover, a cooperative working atmosphere could reverse this situation as well. Experienced workers should shoulder the responsability to cultivate newcomers, whose results could tie with the salaries. As for new workers, they themselves should learn to fit into the whole team. Otherwise, they would be fired.

To summarize, the recruitment system could be blamed for of this phenomenon. However, the business could revolutionize their interview pattern to make a difference.