To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain highest ethical and moral standards.
-
April 11, 2019 at 8:56 am
TOPIC: To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The moral standards of a leader, an essential aspect for the prosperity of an authority, has been discussed and even triggers a heated debate over whether it is necessary for a leader to reserve the highest ethical and moral standards to be effective in his/her tenure. Some people claim that a effective leader must have more moral standards than anyone else. Contrary to these people’s view is my perspective that the moral standards facilitate the efficiency when a leader carry out the policy, yet there are other potencies necessary for a effective leader.
It is acknowledged that people are inclined to connect the leadership with the leader’s moral standard. We all take the fact for granted that a honest, frugal, sympathy leader will perform well, increase the welfare of people and make effective policies to make the region move toward wealth and prosperity. For example, the leaders during the Anti-Japanese war in China, who were all so kind and warm-hearted to share his or her food with the subordinates in such a material deficiency situation, won people’s support most and inspired more people to join the army to defend. It was the moral standard that gave the people to trust the leader and implemented suggestion of the leader. It is hardly to imagine that an spendthrift leader during that time would carry out the order effectively and save people from suffering.
However, it is not prudent to equal the effectiveness to the highest ethical standards. For one reason, no one is perfect. A leader may have trivial shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it as long as the leader has what needs to benefit the society and make progress in many aspects, such as science, technology and art. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position. Another reason is that even the leader with the high moral standards is not in accordance with the argument since it is “highest” not “high”. A leader surely stands out of the pack and his or her behavior influence the people most and are scrutinized by people most. In such a situation, even the leader with the very high ethical standards cannot satisfy everyone since the moral judgements differ in people.
Another perspective to examine the argument is that an effective leader depends on many factors besides moral standards. A leader with only highest moral standards certainly cannot make huge difference to the society. Whether the leader is knowledgeable in politics, laws, economy and international relationship and decisive judgement matters more in regard to the effectiveness. Only by this leadership can a leader make contribution to the people and society.
In general, a high moral standard may benefit officials a lot, but it is not proper to rely on too much on the moral to effectively carry out decision. To be a effective leader, a public official must be conversant in many aspects.
April 13, 2019 at 5:08 pmReport from WritersForMe.com
SCORE
52.7
PROBLEMS
- A large number of sentences exceeds 20 words;
- Excessive use of passive-voice sentences (reduce to less than 5%);
- A large number of grammatical errors;
- Convention errors (check sentence spacing);
- Punctuation errors (check online how to use comma and semicolon within a sentence or between sentences/clauses);
- Vocabulary/Variety (avoid using same words/expressions).
GOOD POINTS
- Sentence flow: Great!
- Paragraph Lenth: Great!
- Transition Words: Great
Please rewrite and re-upload your essay. Please also limit your essay to 320 words since I am too busy to work on longer essays.
April 16, 2019 at 4:37 amThe moral standard of a leader, an essential aspect for the prosperity of a nation, has been discussed and even triggers a heated debate over whether it is necessary for a leader to reserve the highest ethical and moral standards to be effective in his/her tenure. Some people claim that it is necessary. Contrary to these people’s view is my perspective that the moral standard facilitates the efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
It is acknowledged that people are inclined to connect the leadership with the leader’s moral standard. We all take the fact for granted that an honest, frugal, sympathy leader will perform well, increase the welfare of people and guide society to prosperity. For example, the leaders during the Anti-Japanese war in China, who were all so kind and warm-hearted to share their food with subordinates in such material deficiency situation, won people’s support most and inspired more people to join army to defend for the integrity of China. Hardly can we imagine that an spendthrift leader during that time would win people’s support, implement policy effectively and save people from suffering.
However, it is imprudent to equate the effectiveness to the highest ethical standard. No one is perfect. A leader may have trivial shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader has what it needs to benefit the society and make progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art. Whether the leader is knowledgeable in politics, laws, economy and international relationship and has decisive judgement matters more regarding the effectiveness. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position. Can we weigh F.D.Roosevelt’s trivial errors over his actions in American Depression and World War II? There is no doubt that his achievements have more profound influence to United Ststes compared with the errors.
An effective leader depends on many factors besides moral standard to be qualified to guide a nation. Only by these factors in leadership can a leader make contributions to people and society.
April 17, 2019 at 9:56 pmScore: 48.2
Problems:
- Excessive use of passive-voice sentences;
- About half of the sentences exceed 20 words;
Below are the hard-read sentences. You must rewrite them.
- The moral standard of a leader, an essential aspect for the prosperity of a nation, has been discussed and even triggers a heated debate over whether it is necessary for a leader to reserve the highest ethical and moral standards to be effective in his/her tenure.
- Contrary to these people’s view is my perspective that the moral standard facilitates the efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
- We all take the fact for granted that an honest, frugal, sympathy leader will perform well, increase the welfare of people and guide society to prosperity.
- For example, the leaders during the Anti-Japanese war in China, who were all so kind and warm-hearted to share their food with subordinates in such material deficiency situation, won people’s support most and inspired more people to join army to defend for the integrity of China.
- Hardly can we imagine that an spendthrift leader during that time would win people’s support, implement policy effectively and save people from suffering.
- A leader may have trivial shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader has what it needs to benefit the society and make progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art.
- Whether the leader is knowledgeable in politics, laws, economy and international relationship and has decisive judgement matters more regarding the effectiveness.
April 18, 2019 at 7:10 amPeople choose a leader to guide the nation toward prosperity. Therefore, the leader’s moral standard plays an important role in people’s mind. Some people claim that it is necessary for a leader to maintain the highest moral standard. In my perspective, the moral standard facilitates the efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
It is acknowledged that people are inclined to connect the leadership with the leader’s moral standard. A leader with high moral standard can win people’s support and the justice of his/her decisions has a larger chance to be accepted by the majority. On the contrary, a leader would lose public trust if he/she chooses to ignore corruption.
However, it is imprudent to equate the effectiveness to the highest ethical standard. No one is perfect. A leader may have small shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader can benefit the society and make progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position. Can we weigh F.D.Roosevelt’s trivial errors over his actions in American Depression and World War II? There is no doubt that his achievements have more profound influence to United States. Besides, the effectiveness of a leader lies in not only moral standard, but also other factors, including leadership, visionary, and cooperative spirit. The environmental pollution asks a leader to negotiate it with industries and scientists, to discover the critical problems underlying the facts and have a decisive mind to implement measures to close factories producing wastes. Over focus on moral standards makes no sense and even has adverse effect.
Besides, we cannot judge a leader’s moral standard in the same framework of other citizens. When it comes to the nation’s secret and social stability, a leader who chooses to hold the truth cannot be blamed. These truths, if open to the public, may be exploited by terrorists, posing a threat to the nation. An effective leader depends on many factors besides moral standard to be qualified to guide a nation. Only with these excellent qualities can a leader make contributions to the people and society.
April 23, 2019 at 2:53 amScore: 56
Problems:
- Many sentences exceed 20 words;
- Shorten your essay to 320 words ( I am too busy to work on a lengthy essay, but you can write a longer one during the GRE exam);
- Numerous grammatical/factual/logical/articles issues (even after my revision);
- Keep each paragraph within 85 words.
Rewrite and resubmit your essay.
Problems Highlight
People choose a leader to guide the nation toward prosperity. Therefore, the leader’s moral standard plays an important role (Verbose Expression) in people’s mind. Some people claim that it is necessary for a leader to maintain the highest moral standard. In my perspective, the moral standard facilitates the efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
It is acknowledged (Passive Voice) that people are inclined (Passive Voice) to connect the leadership with the leader’s moral standard. A leader with high (Grammatical Error) moral standard can win people’s support (Grammatical Error) and the justice of his/her decisions has a larger chance to be accepted by (Passive Voice) the majority. On the contrary, a leader would lose public trust if he/she chooses to ignore corruption.
However, it is imprudent to equate the effectiveness to (Grammatical Error)the highest ethical standard. No one is perfect. A leader may have small shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader can benefit the society (Grammatical Error) and make progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position. Can we weigh F.D.Roosevelt’s trivial errors over his actions in American (Grammatical Error)Depression and World War II? There is no doubt that his achievements have more (Grammatical Error) profound influence to United (Grammatical Error) States. Besides, the effectiveness of a leader lies in not only moral standard, but also other factors, including leadership, visionary, and cooperative spirit. The environmental pollution asks a leader to negotiate it with industries and scientists, to discover the critical problems underlying the facts and have a decisive mind to implement measures to close factories producing wastes. Over focus (Grammatical Error) on moral standards makes no sense and even has adverse (Grammatical Error) effect.
Besides, we cannot judge a leader’s moral standard in the same framework of other citizens. When it comes to the nation’s secret and social stability, a leader who chooses to hold the truth cannot be blamed (Passive Voice). These truths, if open to the public, may be exploited by (Passive Voice)terrorists, posing a threat to the nation. An effective leader depends on many factors besides moral standard to be qualified (Passive Voice) to guide a nation. Only with these excellent qualities can a leader make contributions to the people and society.
Partial Revision
People choose a leader to guide the nation toward prosperity. Therefore, the leader’s moral standard plays an important role in people’s mind. Some people claim that it is necessary for a leader to maintain the highest moral standard. In my perspective, the moral standard facilitates efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
It is acknowledged that people are inclined to connect the leadership with the leader’s moral standard. A leader with a high moral standard can win people’s support, and the justice of his/her decisions has a larger chance to be accepted by the majority. On the contrary, a leader would lose public trust if he/she chooses to ignore corruption.
However, it is imprudent to equate the effectiveness of the highest ethical standard. No one is perfect. A leader may have small shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader can benefit society and make progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position. Can we weigh F.D.Roosevelt’s trivial errors over his actions in the American Depression and World War II? There is no doubt that his achievements have a more profound influence on the United States. Besides, the effectiveness of a leader lies in not only moral standard, but also other factors, including leadership, visionary, and cooperative spirit. The environmental pollution asks a leader to negotiate it with industries and scientists, to discover the critical problems underlying the facts and have a decisive mind to implement measures to close factories producing wastes. An excessive focus on moral standards makes no sense and even has an adverse effect.
Besides, we cannot judge a leader’s moral standard in the same framework of other citizens. When it comes to the nation’s secret and social stability, a leader who chooses to hold the truth cannot be blamed. These truths, if open to the public, may be exploited by terrorists, posing a threat to the nation. An effective leader depends on many factors besides moral standard to be qualified to guide a nation. Only with these excellent qualities can a leader make contributions to the people and society.
April 23, 2019 at 1:08 pmPeople choose a leader to guide the nation toward prosperity. Some people claim that it is necessary for a leader to maintain the highest moral standard. In my perspective, the moral standard facilitates efficiency when a leader carries out the policy, yet there are other dimensions to judge the effectiveness of a leader.
Most citizens readily connect the leadership with leader’s moral standard. To be more specific, the masses will trust the leader with a high moral standard, support his/her policies and devote themselves to implementing these decisions. On the contrary, a leader would lose public trusts and end up in failure if he/she chooses to ignore corruption or hold back the information related to the interests of people.
However, it is imprudent to equate the effectiveness of the highest ethical standard. No one is perfect. A leader may have small shortcomings in morality, but people could brook it if the leader makes progress in well-being, environment, science, technology and art. If all citizens put much emphasis on the moral aspect, chances are that no leader can be suitable for the position.
Besides, the effectiveness of a leader lies in not only moral standard, but also other factors, including leadership, visionary, and cooperative spirit. The environmental pollution asks a leader to negotiate it with industries and scientists, to discover essential problems and to have a decisive mind to close the factories producing wastes. An excessive focus on moral standards makes no sense and even has an adverse effect.
In addition, we cannot judge a leader’s morality in the same standard with other citizens. When it comes to the nation’s secret and social stability, a leader choosing to hold the truth should deserve people’s applause rather than criticism. The misuse of these truths by terrorists could pose a threat to the nation.
To sum up, people welcome a leader with the highest moral standard, but there are other factors conducive to the effectiveness of a leader.
April 23, 2019 at 1:47 pmScore: 53.5
Remaining issue
- More than half of the sentences exceed 20 words; you need to shorten or split them.
April 23, 2019 at 8:52 pmHi, please find your final edited essay below.
https://writersforme.com/song-wanying-gre-essay-20190423/
Regards.
Lin Qiu
