To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories.

To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories.

To begin with, we are told the alarming news that Buckingham College will build  brand-new dormitories so as to serve the demand for students housing. Likewise, contents only indicate that Buckingham’s enrollment is growing and based on current trends, it is not implausible that college inevitably builds the new dormitory. For example, whether they take the age and state of repair of existing dorms into consideration, and if they conduct a survey throughout all the students. We need further proof to verify the argument mentioned in the memo.

Buckingham’s enrolment is growing and based on current trends, will double over the next fifty years. We need to verify what the current trends are, is it based on the latest sociable and demographic journal? Who are the target audiences in the current trends? We necessarily seek further proof to assure whether college enrollment is pertinent to current trends. In addition, predicting any sociable and demographic change in the next 50 years is rarely easy and unreliable, the predictive model must be elaborated before putting unbounded trust in its prognostications.

With enrollment double over the next 50 years, existing dormitory spaces are likely to be inadequate. This issue involves who these new students will be. If the new students are freshman, students might have a great demand for living in dormitories. Whereas, If students graduate, they are bound to leave plenty of dormitories. When the leaving space can be converted to freshmen, this means that building new dormitories Buckingham College is not their priority. Similarly, if the new students are commuters, students who go to college by public transportation need no further living facilities.

The average rent for an apartment in our town has risen in recent years. Consequently, students will find it increasingly difficult to afford off-campus housing. This may well be. But, unless we know a great deal about the level of affluence of Buckingham students, we cannot say so with any certainty. If Buckingham’s students tend to be economically disadvantaged, the claim about rent is likely true. If the college attracts upscale students, this rise may be a matter of no great concern to them. Moreover, If students are eager to share a house with their close friend off-campus, living in the dorm might not be their best choice.

Finally, before Buckingham College builds the new dormitories, we need further evidence as mentioned whereas, it is possible that colleges are taking high-risky of constructing new dormitories.