Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
TOEFL, IELTS, Personal Statement and CV Proofreading Services. › IELTS Writing › Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
-
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As gender gap narrows, people nowadays have equal access to education. However, as far as effectiveness and equality are concerned, I disagree with the idea that each subject should admit the same numbers of male and female students.
The main reason is that educational resources are not effectively utilized under this practice. Experienced professors are hired and government funds are invested with the aim of cultivating students who have a talent in a particular field. In this way, they can become useful members of the society in the future. However, different genders share different talents. For example, males are better at mathematics and computer science, while females are more talented at literature and language. If gender quotas were set in these subjects, then some talented students would be forced to choose other subjects they dislike, which is definitely a loss to the society.
Also, although admitting equal numbers of each gender seems to address the problem of gender discrimination, it is not a fair criterion for individuals. Admission to university subjects should only rely on students’ academic abilities instead of gender. Students who get a high grade in the aptitude test should be awarded with the right to choose their subjects. Only in this way, students will make effort to study hard for their aspiration since they realize that competence is the sole standard.
In conclusion, although discrimination on the grounds of sex should be prohibited in education, it is an extreme and wrong practice to accept equal numbers of female and male students.
Please fix the issues suggested by the screenshot reviews.
As the gender gap narrows, people nowadays have equal access to education. However, as far as effectiveness and equality are concerned, I disagree that each subject should admit the same number of male and female students.
The main reason is that this practice fails to utilize educational resources effectively. The government has invested large quantities of educational funds to hire experienced professors, aiming to cultivate students who have a talent in a particular field. In this way, they can become useful members of society in the future. However, different genders share different talents. For example, males are better at mathematics and computer science, while females are more talented at literature and language. If schools set gender quotas in every subject, some talented students would be forced to choose other subjects they dislike, which is definitely a loss to society.
Also, although admitting equal numbers of each gender seems to address the problem of gender discrimination, it is not a fair criterion for individuals. Admission to university subjects should only rely on students’ academic abilities instead of gender. Students who get a high grade in the aptitude test should be awarded the right to choose their subjects. Only in this way, students will make effort to study hard for their aspirations since they realize that competence is the sole standard.
In conclusion, although discrimination on the grounds of sex should be prohibited in education, it is an extreme and wrong practice to accept equal numbers of female and male students.
As the gender gap narrows, people nowadays have equal access to education. However, (as far as effectiveness and equality are concerned)[ unclear ], I disagree that each subject should admit the same number of male and female students.
The main reason is that this practice
fails to utilize[ could waste ] educational resourceseffectively.The government[ unclear ] has[Many governments, for instance, ]invested[expended/ Invest contains the concept of FUND ]large quantities of educational[substantive amounts of ]funds to hire experienced professors(, aiming)[/as a means/in an effort ] to cultivate studentswho have a talent[ gifted ]in a particular field. In this way,they[these students ] can become useful[ /valuable citizens ]members of societyin the future. However, different genders[usually exhibit ]sharedifferent talents.For example,[In general, ] males are better at mathematics and computer science, while females are more talented at literature and language. If schools set gender quotas in every subject, some talented students wouldbe forced[have ]to choose other subjects [that ]they dislike, [thereby incurring personal and societal losses ]which is definitely a loss to society.Also, although admitting equal numbers of each gender seems to address the problem of gender discrimination, it is not a fair criterion for individuals. Admission to [In my view, enrollment in each ]university
subjects[ subject ]should only rely[ relies ]on students’ academic abilities instead of gender.Students[ As such, the students ] who get[/receive ] a high grade in the aptitude test should beawarded the right[prioritized ] to choose their [ preferable ]subjects. Only in this way, [will ]studentswillmake [an ]effort to study hardfor their aspirations since they realize that competence is the sole standard.In conclusion, although discrimination on the grounds of sex [/gender ]should be prohibited in education, it is an
extreme and wrong[incorrect ]practice to accept equal numbers of female and male students [ to every academic subject ].[ / means or ]
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.