Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
-
March 4, 2020 at 6:37 am
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some universities hold the view of gender equality in every course. Although it is essential to emphasize gender balanced in social life, but I would argue that adjustments of some subjects, which are extreme gender imbalanced, would be necessary.
Gender equality can foster technological development and encourage young generation. In general, there is a lower proportion of female students in certain professions such as engineering and information technology. The reason behind this is the traditional stereotype, which holds that men are superior to women in these fields. However, different gender would see the world in opposite ways. Female would become new blood and provide creative ideas in male-dominated fields, and eventually further industrial improvements. If a more gender-balanced workforce were visible, young people would follow and break the stereotypes in order to gain social approval.
However, a rigid 50/50 gender balance in all subjects would be unnecessary, which may lead to a loss of outstanding students. A sudden and strict gender equality would have to reduce the number of a certain gender students. Some motivated and qualified students may lose the chance of studying what they are really good at. At the same time, some may have to learn what they are not capable of. For example, if a certain number of students cannot choose their favorite majors, they may lack enthusiasm. It will be meaningless to study further in universities. As a result, there is a waste of time and resources for both students and universities.
In conclusion, gender equality can promote the industrial development and inspire ambitious young generation. We should also notice that the rigid gender balance would sometimes be superfluous.
March 4, 2020 at 5:04 pmScore: 51
I will send you screenshots to illustrate specific problems/errors.
March 5, 2020 at 1:29 amThis is the modified version:
Some universities hold the view of gender equality in every course. Although it is important to emphasize gender-balanced in social life, I would argue that a modest adjustment of severe-imbalanced courses would be practical.
Gender equality can foster technological development and encourage the young generation. In general, females have inequal opportunities in certain professions, such as engineering and information technology. It is the traditional stereotype which holds that men are superior to women in these fields. However, the different gender would see the world in opposite ways. Female would become new blood and provide creative ideas in male-dominated fields, which can further industrial developments. Establishing a more gender-balanced workforce, young people will follow and break the gender stereotype. As a consequence, they can have more opportunities to make great achievements and gain social approval.
I agree with adjusting gender-imbalanced subjects, but a rigid 50/50 gender balance may be unnecessary. Sudden and strict gender equality would have to reduce the number of one specific gender of students. As a result, universities would lose a certain number of motivated and qualified students in some particular fields. At the same time, some students may have to enroll in those majors where they would find no enthusiasm. Imagining that a certain number of students cannot choose their favorite majors, it may be meaningless to study further in universities. In consequence, there would be a waste of time and resources for both students and universities.
In conclusion, gender equality can promote industrial development and inspire ambitious college students. We may also notice that the rigid gender balance would sometimes be superfluous.
March 10, 2020 at 2:41 amScore: 43.2
Some universities hold the view of gender equality in every course [unclear/rephrase ]. Although it is important to emphasize gender-balanced in social life, I would argue that a modest adjustment of severe-imbalanced [wrong word ]courses would be practical.
Gender equality can foster technological development and encourage the young generation[ logical incompleteness ]. In general, females have inequal[spelling error ] opportunities in certain professions, such as engineering and information technology. It is the traditional stereotype which [wrong pronoun ]holds that men are superior to women in these fields. However, the different gender would see the world in opposite ways. Female[ word form error ] would become new blood[unclear ] and provide creative ideas in male-dominated fields, which can further industrial developments. Establishing[ dangling ] a more gender-balanced workforce, young people will follow[grammatical error ] and break the gender stereotype. As a consequence, they can have more opportunities to make great achievements and gain social approval.
I agree with adjusting gender-imbalanced subjects, but a rigid 50/50 gender balance may be unnecessary. Sudden and strict gender equality would have to reduce the number of one[redundant ] specific gender of students. As a result, universities would lose a certain number of motivated and qualified students in some particular fields. At the same time, some students may have to enroll in those majors where they would find no enthusiasm. Imagining that a certain number of students cannot choose their favorite majors, it may be meaningless to study further[redundant ] in universities. In consequence[ wrong phrase], there would be a waste of time and resources for both students and universities.
In conclusion, gender equality can promote industrial development and inspire ambitious college students. We may also notice that the rigid gender balance would sometimes be superfluous.
March 11, 2020 at 12:48 amThis is the modified version:
Some universities hold the view of gender equality in every subject. Although it is important to emphasize gender-balanced in social life, I would argue that a modest adjustment of severely imbalanced courses would be practical.Gender equality can foster technological development and encourage the young generation to make great success. In general, females have unequal opportunities in certain professions, such as engineering and information technology. It is the traditional stereotype holding that men are superior to women in these fields. However, the different gender would see the world in opposite ways. Women would become fresh blood in male-dominated fields and provide creative ideas, which can further industrial developments. If societies establish a more gender-balanced workforce, young people will try to break the gender stereotype. As a consequence, they can have more opportunities to make great achievements and gain social approval.
I agree with adjusting gender-imbalanced subjects, but a rigid 50/50 gender balance may be unnecessary. Sudden and strict gender equality would have to reduce the number of a specific gender of students. As a result, universities would lose a certain number of motivated and qualified students in some particular fields. At the same time, some students may have to enroll in those majors where they would find no enthusiasm. Imagining that a certain number of students cannot choose their favorite majors, it may be meaningless to study in universities. Therefore, there would be a waste of time and resources for both students and universities.
In conclusion, gender equality can promote industrial development and inspire ambitious college students. We may also notice that the rigid gender balance would sometimes be superfluous.
March 13, 2020 at 3:14 amScore: 43.7
Hi, I am unable to work on your essay since almost all sentences are either grammatically wrong or logically confusing.
Some universities hold the view of gender equality in every subject [ confusing/grammatical error ]. Although it is important to emphasize gender-balanced in social life[ grammatical error ], I would argue that a modest adjustment of severely imbalanced courses would be practical[unclear ].
Gender equality can foster technological development and encourage the young generation to make great success. In general, females have unequal opportunities in certain professions, [punctuation error ]such as engineering and information technology. It is the traditional stereotype holding[redundant ] that men are superior to women in these fields.[ went off the topic sentence ] However, the different gender would see the world in opposite ways. Women would become fresh blood in male-dominated fields and provide creative ideas, which can further industrial developments. If societies establish a more gender-balanced workforce, young people will try to break the gender stereotype. As a consequence, they can have more opportunities to make great achievements and gain social approval.
I agree with adjusting gender-imbalanced subjects, but a rigid 50/50 gender balance may be unnecessary. Sudden and strict gender equality would have to reduce the number of a specific gender of students. As a result, universities would lose a certain number of motivated and qualified students in some particular fields. At the same time, some students may have to enroll in those majors where they would find no enthusiasm. Imagining that a certain number of students cannot choose their favorite majors, it may be meaningless to study in universities. Therefore, there would be a waste of time and resources for both students and universities.
In conclusion, gender equality can promote industrial development and inspire ambitious college students. We may also notice that the rigid gender balance would sometimes be superfluous.
