University students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study
-
August 31, 2021 at 2:43 pm
It is critically not a considerable idea that every student must take history courses no matter what major they are. Personally, I strongly disagree. I feel this way for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject that is not related to their major. Imagine if you were majoring in business management, did it really matter that you had to study history? There is no relationship between both subjects. Students would be too overwhelmed if they had to learn a widediversity of subjects. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. Based on this situation, I needed to spend extra time studying it since I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues. Due to that, I was under too much pressure and my gpa was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though.
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on the history courses material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it. Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their gpa will decline like me. No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spend money for those class. In addition, they also need to buy a extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benfinical from learning history courses.
September 1, 2021 at 9:37 amIt is critically not a considerable idea that (simplify) every student must take history courses no matter what major they are (their major). Personally, I strongly disagree (delete, repetitive). I feel this way (Students should not be forced to take history courses) for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject that is not related (unrelated) to their major. Imagine if you were (you are) majoring in business management, did (does) it really matter that you had to (if you) study history? There is no relationship between both subjects. (combine two previous sentences) Students would be too overwhelmed if they had to learn a widediversity of subjects. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. Based on this situation, I needed to spend extra time studying it since I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues. Due to that, I was under too much pressure and my gpa was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though.
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on the history courses material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it. Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their gpa will decline like me. No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spend money for those class. In addition, they also need to buy a extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benfinical from learning history courses.
September 1, 2021 at 9:37 amPartial revision [Please fix same/similar errors and then resubmit your essay.]
September 2, 2021 at 5:55 amIt would be an adverse effect that students must take history courses no matter what their major is. I think students should not be forced to take history courses for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject unrelated to their major since there would be no relationship between both subjects. Imagine you are majoring in business management, it really matter if you study history? Students would be too overwhelmed if they had to learn a wide diversity of subjects. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. Based on this situation, I needed to spend extra time studying it since I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues. Due to that, I was under too much pressure and my gpa was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though.
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on the history courses material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it. Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their gpa will decline like me. No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spend money for those classes. In addition, they also need to buy an extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benfinical from learning history courses.
September 2, 2021 at 10:48 amIt would be an adverse effect that(adversely effect) students must take history courses no matter what their major is (if they were forced to take history courses regardless of their major). I think students should not be forced to take history courses for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject unrelated to their major since there would be no relationship between both subjects. Imagine you are majoring in business management, does it really matter if you study history? Students would be too overwhelmed if they had to learn a wide diversity of subjects. (repetitive) My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. Based on this situation, I needed to spend extra time studying it since I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues. Due to that, I was under too much pressure and my gpa was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though. (previous four sentences should be combine into two sentences and significantly simplified)
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on the (delete) history courses (singular) material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it (why is this here?). Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their gpa (GPA) will decline like me (delete). No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spend (verb form error) money for those classes. In addition, they also need to buy an extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benfinical (spelling error) from learning history courses.
September 2, 2021 at 10:49 amPartial revision [Make edits based on suggestions, essay still needs to be simplified for clarity, focus on removing unnecessary words and sentences]
September 2, 2021 at 4:15 pmIt would adversely effect students if they were forced to take history courses regardless of their major. I think students should not be forced to take history courses for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject unrelated to their major since there would be no relationship between both subjects. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it. Imagine you are majoring in business management, does it really matter if you study history? My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. However, I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues so it made me too stressful. Therefore, I needed to spend extra time studying it but as a result, my GPA was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though.
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on history course material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their GPA will decline massively. No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spending money for those classes. In addition, they also need to buy an extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benifit from learning history courses.
September 2, 2021 at 4:34 pmIt would adversely effect students if they were forced to take history courses regardless of their major. I think students should not be forced to take history courses for two major reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students would be under too much stress if they had to study a subject unrelated to their major since there would be no relationship between both subjects. It is not surprising that students who are not majoring in history do not know about it. Imagine you are majoring in business management, does it really matter if you study history? My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. The university required us to take the history course otherwise we were not able to graduate. However, I was not majoring in history and I was not familiar with those history theories and issues so it made me too stressful. Therefore, I needed to spend extra time studying it but as a result, my GPA was also directly and inevitably influenced by that though.
Secondly, students need to spend extra money on history course material and some even might need to attend a tutorial class. Therefore, if universities require them to take a history course, there is no doubt that they might choose to go to some tutorial class to enhance their knowledge otherwise their GPA will decline massively. No matter students or their families, they will just get too much stress on spending money for those classes. In addition, they also need to buy an extra book and it also causes the cost of study overwhelming.
To sum up, learning history is not suitable for every student in the university. I cannot see that students can take any benifit from learning history courses.
September 3, 2021 at 3:29 amFix errors indicated on screenshot reviews.
