Nana
TruckersForMe Participant TruckersForMe Participant

Your Replies

  • Nana
    University: agricultural university
    Nationality: china
    July 24, 2020 at 8:44 am

    What we are discussing is the topic about whether there is a general tendency that people who have more money are supposed to donate or not. Some sociologists contend that people with more money should allocate them to efficient projects like investing children’s education so forth instead of donating that is not useful. As for me, giving away to the charity is beneficial to the donor and the donee, especially in the aspect of social status and living standards.

    To begin with, from the perspective of donors with more money, it is easier to raise their social status dramatically by giving away the charity. Currently, the authority motivates the people especially the fresh middle-stages to donate to the charity, which could create well being and harmonious social atmosphere. Moreover, the plethora of welfare and occupation that the government provides support people to give away the charity. Take Hua Zhang who is my high school president as an example. With the increasing revenues of him, Hua distributed a large proportion of salary to giving away the homeless, which allowed him to award by the local authority. Eventually, Hua became the NPC member honorably by voting from the public and the government.

    Furthermore, from the perspective of the donee, their living standard could enhance dramatically since sufficient subsidy could help them to sustain and to prevent from daily stress. The comprehensive charity provides financial aids, residences, certificated organ foods so forth to the homeless. Embracing this welfare and benefits, the homeless’ living standard would improve and raise the awareness of reciprocal. For instance, John, who grew up in an impecunious family, graduated from Peking University and now works in an outstanding corporation.  He told me that what considerable change he encountered derived from the wealthy donated and the charity supported. The available for him to travel, support the homeless, and do some projects that beyond he used to expect.  If without support from the charity, John could not acquire such unexpectable achievement and think about how reciprocate to society.

    All in all, the more money a person has, the more he or she is supposed to give away to charities. It is beneficial for both donators and donees.