Mr.Lin Qiu. This is the revised article

The issue of whether the national administration should allocate funding for a career orientation program to 26 years old and above is a debatable topic. However, although many people take the attitude that it is imperative for the authorities to invest in, from my own perspective, not all adults need such work courses.

Admittedly, a work guide is of vital importance to ensure all graduates are not jobless. In fact, some people think unemployment is closely associated with the lack of education, thus demanding attention from the government. Moreover, it is the government’s responsibility to implement effective policies and take immediate measures to combat unemployment; it is their duty to their people. Therefore, they shouldn’t ignore the value of providing the most up-to-date courses relating to the workplace.

Nevertheless, I don’t think it is necessary for the government to spend money on providing such courses to all adults beyond 25 years old. Such a policy will increase the financial pressure of the government. For example, just like an average man who has limited money and needs to balance his budget, the government must also keep its budget balanced.

In addition, if the government pays for all adults, the value of the course will be reduced. For instance, in the past, taking employment-related courses means you can perform better than the others and you are more likely to be promoted to a higher position or work on an important project. To illustrate, suppose everyone can obtain these courses; as a result, everyone will have the same skills. Unfortunately, there will be no diversity of skills in the office if it happens, and the updated courses will lose its status and be quickly outdated. For that reason, this policy could not be effective.

To conclude, I believe that the federal leaders’ policy on spending national budget on job training is useless. This is because their finances can’t afford it, and the courses will be outdated soon though this policy is working. So from where I stand, I think helping some people learn new working abilities is meaningful, but spending for all is unwise.