Although there are fierce debates about the relationship within a group-work, the decision switching from compromising to winning is ultimately still a stigma for every group members.

To say, with more empathsis on submitting to the “Greater Good”, the interest of the union is listed as priority. Plenty of historical events, for example, the second world war in the last century, has already proved the unsong sacrifise of soldiers in field. Generally, personal identity or thoughts within the troup is compromised by orders for the entire group, which ensures a further and more promising blueprint in army deploy. What’s more, in commercial issues, workers who involved in a business deal displace not only their personal apperance or accent but also the idea and contered purpose of the whole group. To take the Deutsch Bank for example, which has recently suspended part of the collaboration with Trump. This decision could be a potential threat to the cooperation between Trump-related componies and some european international corporations. However, from a larger scale, it also restrained the existing risk of being affected by oversea commercial powers.

The result are actually not taked seriously, whether winning or losing. Outcome could be the final end of a group-work, so does the process. When there are some interesting debutes about the meaning of victory or failure, the process of the whole work seems more important. For instance, in political areas, there are items “doulble-win” used in the collaborated between Chinese government and the Japanese government, which encourages a consensus in political compromise during the 2018, enabling the export and import business to run further with higher tax rate.

To sum up, for the group leader, compromising would also leading the group to the final result, where the result lays no more importance as the process, since policital and commercial issues are always concerned with many other issues.