People have conflicts over what attitude one should take when in the face of a bad situation. Some claim to accept it, while others struggle hard with it. From my point of view, I would lean towards the latter and strive to be a changer.

On the one hand, from the perspective of some pessimists, there are huge benefits if we ignore the unsatisfactory part of life. They claim that life would be much easier if we accept unhappiness in life, especially for those with nothing. For example, if a poor man always sticks to an ambitious dream of making a large amount of money, anxiety and strain would be there with him especially before destination is reached, because he should spare no effort to sharpen skills and expend knowledge than those better-off.

On the other hand, optimists argue that dissatisfaction with life and willingness to seek improvement can help people attain success. Only when people are aware of the reasons why they fail and then pick up valuable experience can they avoid similar failure they might come across later. For instance, it is not uncommon for a fresh graduate to be rebuffed when hunting for a job time and time again. If lessons can be totally reviewed and sunk in, like a better answer to questions asked, rather than swamping himself in self-doubt, he will perform better in the next interview which might lead to a satisfying job.

Personally, I do suggest that instead of being caught in a bad situation and just accepting it, the first thing that people should do is to think about reasons and take prompt measures to change and improve it. Letting go of the bad situation without improving never makes you stronger.