“Throwaway society” seems a trend all over the world nowadays. people wonder what cause it and what the trend leads to? I think economic development and business competition are responsible for the change. In the meantime, this tendency has a positive effect on economy in turn although causes waste and pollution.

Firstly, economic development is pivotal in forming “throwaway society”. People’s disposable income increased noticeably as the improvement of living standards. So they tend to buy various wares except necessaries, but some of which turn out to be unpractical. Besides, the young generation, the main force in purchasing, prefer fresh stuffs like cellphones in pursuit of latest technologies. In order to keep pace with the times and predominate the market, manufactures focus on designing new products all the time. Thus produtcs are easily superseded by relatively new ones, which brings about short life spans of goods.

And what may it lead to? In my opinion, it’s detrimental to the environment. Because throwaway society totally belies the principle of sustainable development, more materials and resources are wasted during the process. Nevertheless, it can foster innovation. In this ‘throwaway society’, consumers become demanding, longing for approximately consummate products with various functions in one. Consequently, companies resort to innovation to cater to public requirements for the sake of market competitiveness. Finally, it promotes economic growth. Because consumer’s expenditures are essential in economic development, contributing to Gross Domestic Product.

In conclusion, throwaway society mainly results from economic growth, purchasing habits and faster update cycle. In the meanwhile, it poses a threat to environment but contributes to economic growth and industrial innovation.

“Throwaway society” is seemingly a trend all over the world nowadays. And people wonder what cause it and what the trend leads to? I think economic development and business competition are responsible for the change. In the meantime, this tendency has a positive effect on economy in turn but causes waste and pollution.

Firstly, economic development is pivotal in forming “throwaway society”. People’s disposable income increased noticeably as the improvement of living standards. So, they tend to buy various wares except necessaries,  but some of which turn out to be not functional. Besides, the young generation, the main force in purchasing, prefer fresh stuffs in pursuit of latest technologies. For example,  the majority of Iphone customers are young adults. However,  the update cycle of commodities like cellphones is short.  In order to keep pace with the times and predominate the market, manufactures focus on designing new products all the time while the consumers follow them behind.Thus life cycles of merchandises shorten considerably.

And what may it lead to? In my opinion, it’s detrimental to the environment. Throwaway society totally belies the principle of sustainable development, more materials and resources are wasted during the process. Nevertheless, it can foster innovation. In this ‘throwaway society’, consumers become demanding, longing for approximately consummate products with various functions in one. And products are easily replaced by new ones. Consequently,In order to be more competitive, companies resort to innovation to cater to public requirements. Finally, it promotes economic growth. Because consumer’s expenditures are essential in economic development, contributing to Gross Domestic Product.

In conclusion, “throwaway society mainly results from economic growth, purchasing habits and faster update cycle. In the meanwhile, it poses a threat to environment but contributes to economic growth and industrial innovation.

“Throwaway society” is seemingly a trend all over the world nowadays. And a lot people wonder what cuase it and what the trend lead to?

To begin with, ecomomic development is pivotal in forming “throwaway society”. People’s disposable income increased noticeably as the improvement of living standard. So, they tend to buy various produts excepet necessaries, which are not indispensable. Besides, the young generation, the main force in purchasing,formed a bad purchasing habit. Unlike their seniorities, most of them never suffer poverty or deprivation of goods and materials. They take spending money lavishly for granted. In addition, mojarity of them are inclined to buy on a whim after watching the advertisement or a slight discount. However, finally they find what they bought is not satisfying as the propoganda or unnecessary for them. Last, the update cycle becomes shorter and shorter, take cellphones for example, cellphones companies almost release new cellphones several times a year. Every products seem to face the fate of being out-dated. In order to keep pace with the times, companies focus on desinging new produts all the time while the customers follow them behind.

And what may it lead to? In my opinion, it’s detrimental to the environment. Throwaway society totally belies sustainable development, it wastes more materials and resources in the same span of time. And recycling is not adopted in this type of society. However, it can foster innovation. Because customers have higher requirements, they long for buying approximately consummate products, which combine various functions in one. Consequently,in order to cater to them,  companies resort to innovation to be competitive or ser the trend in their fields. Finally, it promotes economic growth. Consumer’s expenditures are essential in ecnomic development, contributing to Gross Domestic Product.

In conclusion, “throwaway society” is mainly caused by economic growth, purchasing habits and update cycle. In the meanwhile, it poses a threat to environment but contributes to economic growth and industrial innovation.

There has been a debate about the range of subjects students should learn.  Some people insist students should concentrate on all subjects instead of focusing on the subject they prefer. While others hold a different view. I totally agree with balancing all subjects.

One benefit of balancing all subjects is that it enables students accessible to extensive knowledge. And this process prompts them to broaden their horizon and the scope of knowledge. Moreover, learning all subjects means more possibilities, especially in university.  For example, you don’t know that you may be talented in one subject without learning it. Besides, numerous worker realize what they learnt at school is very useful even those they deem futile in the past.   Another benefit is that concentrating on all subjects is likely to achive the all-round development of students. Those elites possessing a wider range of knowledge are just the requirements of many large companies. Therefore, they are prone to face better job prospect in the future.

On the other hand, focusing on the subject they prefer can drive more passion for study. Thus most of them take initiatives to study rather than being pushed by parents and teachers. In addition, in-depth study on one subject makes it impossible for them to become experts in their own fields apiece.

In my view, students had better concentrate on all subejects so that they can become learned and erudite. In the meantime, they can find their potential and develop in an all-round way during the procedure. Although favourite subjects excites more ethusiasm for study.