nly
Your Replies
-
March 28, 2020 at 3:37 pm
The urban transport system is usually composed of railways and roads. It is thought that constructing railways should be given priority to building roads. I fully agree with this opinion.
Railways are more suitable for the requirement in transportation in the current fast-paced life. The transporting load of railways in a unit time is larger and it is also a faster approach of conveyance on land. A train can carry about 5,000 passengers at a time, which is a hundred times of that a bus. Particularly in inter-city travelling, people do not have to suffer congestions especially during holiday before reaching their destinations. This is because rail transport has its own strong operating system. The railway has special tracks and lines that are not accessible by other means of transport.
Besides, rail transportation is more environmentally friendly. Electricity powered by renewable fuels is the energy resource of it. Unlike road transport using petrol, railways put less pressure on the limited natural resources. Utilization of alternative energy like electricity, to some extent, reduces dependence on those non-renewable energy. What’s more, as a form of public transportation, the railway does less harm to the air. Vehicles leave a great number of particles in the air that are detrimental to the air condition. Compared to them, according to a study in Japan, railways emit one-tenth as much carbon as cars. Therefore, investing on railways instead of roads can ameliorate air pollution.
Overall, improving rail networks is more meaningful for the long-term development of the city than constructing roads.
February 25, 2020 at 10:55 amRecently, saving resources has become the consensus of most citizens. Some people argue that introducing laws should be the only way for governments to encourage waste recycling. In my view, strict requirements set by the administration do have many advantages.
Laws ensure the efficiency of recycling. As a mandatory measure, legislation has a stronger warning and supervisory effect. Today, types of household waste are so complex that people are unwilling to recycle. Only under the supervision of laws, every family will take the initiative to recycle more garbage. Once people form the habit of recycling, the phenomenon of delaying and refusing reduces. In addition, enforcing laws is a government action. Local governments arrange the work uniformly under the guidance of regulations. As a result, although the distribution of domestic waste is wide, the majority of wastes can be recycled in a short time.
Laws guarantee the sustainability of reusing household rubbish. Laws not only tighten relations on people but also exert influence on their education. By setting up specific methods, laws instruct people to recycle waste in a scientific way. Residents who lack knowledge about waste sorting and recycling can make full use of household garbage. In this way, legal requirements cultivate people’s awareness of recycling. They will lay more emphasis on sustainable development and dispose household waste in a more scientific way.
In conclusion, legal means are necessary in order to tackle the waste problem. Governments should play their part in looking after the environment and limited resources.
February 23, 2020 at 5:34 amBoth railways and roads are significant to the establishment of the urban transport system. But today’s population is growing rapidly, and roads may be not well-suited for fast-growing cities. I maintain that it is better for governments to invest more money to build railways.
Railways are more suitable for the current fast-paced life. The transporting load of railage in a unit time is the largest and it is also the fastest approach of conveyance on land. Particularly in metropolitan areas, people do not have to wait for a long time before reaching their destinations. Also, rail transport has its own strong operating system. The railway has special tracks and lines that are not accessible by other means of transport. During the rush hour, transporting by railways decreases the risk of traffic congestions.
Rail transportation is more environmentally friendly. Powered by electricity instead of petrol, railways put less pressure on the limited natural resources. Utilization of alternative energy like electricity, to some extent, reduces dependence on those non-renewable energy. What’s more, as a form of public transportation, the railway lessens the number of private cars on the road. Vehicles leave a great number of particles in the air that are detrimental to the air condition. Compared to them, according to a study in Japan, railways emit one-tenth as much carbon as cars. Therefore, air pollution and other kinds of pollution will ameliorate as a result of the decreasing traffic flow.
Overall, improving rail networks is more meaningful for the long-term development of the city than constructing roads.
February 16, 2020 at 10:23 amRecently, recycling has become a general concern. It is sometimes argued that making laws should be the only way for governments to encourage waste recycling. In my view, strict requirements set by the authorities do have many advantages.
The law ensures the efficiency of recycling. Complex types of household waste lead to the unwillingness to recycle. Legislation, as a mandatory measure, has a stronger warning and supervisory effect. Under the supervision of it, every family will take the initiative to recycle more garbage. Once people get into the habit of recycling, it becomes a second nature. As a result, the phenomenon of delaying and refusing reduces. The wide distribution of domestic waste also makes it difficult to recycle. Only through laws can this problem be effectively overcome. Local governments arrange the work in the guidance of regulations to make sure that all wastes can be recycled.
The law guarantees the sustainability of recycling. Since residents lack knowledge about waste sorting and recycling, they cannot make full use of household garbage. The law not only plays a restrictive role but also exerts its influence on education. By setting up specific methods, it can help people recycle waste in a scientific way. From a long-term point of view, legal requirements cultivate people’s awareness of recycling. They will lay more emphasis on sustainable development, so waste of resources will decrease in the future.
In conclusion, legal means must be required in order to tackle the waste problem. Governments should play their part in looking after the environment and limited resources.
February 6, 2020 at 1:54 pmBoth railways and roads are significant to the establishment of the urban transport system. But today’s population is growing rapidly, and roads may be not well-suited for fast-growing cities. So I maintain that it is better for governments to invest more money to build railways.
Railways are more suitable for the current fast-paced life. The transporting load of railage in a unit time is the largest and it is also the fastest approach of conveyance on land. Additionally, as a result of the growing population in cities, traffic jams become more and more common in our daily life. Although there are various modes of transportation, they are more or less at the risk of traffic congestions, except for rail traffic. This is because rail transport has its own strong operating system. So it is necessary for the authorities to lay more emphasis on the construction of railways.
Rail transportation is more environmentally friendly due to its low carbon emissions. Environmental protection is getting more and more attention now,。However, air pollution and other kinds of pollution have become worse as a result of the increasing traffic. Compared to other kinds of transportation, subways, powered by electricity instead of petrol, do not leave particles in the air that are detrimental to the air condition. Therefore, improving the construction of public transportation, such as railways, is meaningful for the long-term development of the city.
Overall, according to laws of civil development, improving rail networks can bring more convenience than constructing roads.
